***Dear Friends***

 ![image](https://img.esteem.ws/hvlowrpym7.jpg)
[source](https://www.tineye.com/search/08afa8353e360d5ae026081e348ef03e0b58e970/)


**The civilization of the Indonesian nation will soon arrive at one of the peaks of escalation of contention among themselves. One of the minimum results will be saving hatred, resentment and future hostility more deeply. The maximum can be terrible. We are planting and multiplying mines to harm our own future grandchildren.**
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ
**Each party / party that is arguing has confidence in its truth from the point of view of each. And there is no need to extend the problem and add a mine by blaming this or that one. Minimal for a while, it's good to avoid 'pleasure' pointing "who's wrong". If it is wrongly positioned on the subject, then what is upheld is the pros and cons of the parties, then all will be stuck in subjective situations: if we are "pro" a party, then it is "100% true". If we "cons" a party, then it is "wrong 100%". Then we are very far from thinking maturity.**
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ
 ![image](https://img.esteem.ws/k9ywsrra2c.jpg)
[source](https://www.tineye.com/search/5db0400fb6325ff50d714472aae03d878af32527/)


**The product is that we have problems with two things:
First, our children and grandchildren will be confused to learn the history of "truth against the truth" and "goodness against the good".
Secondly, we disputed and denied the essential nature of our own humanity, because "everyone and the parties have a right to blame." Can not be absolutely absolute, can not go wrong absolute.**
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ
**Although bitter and uncomfortable, but what is now needed to do is not to discuss "who is wrong", but sit together with a clear thinking to find "what's wrong". It does require sacrifice on subjective self-esteem. Because the safety of Indonesian history requires honesty, clarity, and masculinity to find each other's faults and truths of others.**


***"Thank you"***


***@boyelleq***