A Different World...

The interference of converged particles in an apple with linear macroscopic expression of quantum magnetic field ..these are what caused Newton to believe that an apple "fell" rather than it being interferently attracted to the center of the Earth at a velocity of 160 mph.

We have corrected the physics of Newton and Einstein, I think they would be satisfied.

I am training for this debate that began as a thought experiment of perspective inversion. We are not going back to falling and gravity until I find logical and scientific confirmation that we should pursue the inverted perspective. I need to expect that those who have been "falling" will perceive me as being of inverted comprehension ..at first.

We can still choose to fall and gravitate for the time being, where science is concerned the concepts are unequivocally incorrect. We can check again using new quantifying instruments along with our newfound perception of the force binding all things to Earth without bias.

We can use the archaic terms which recall a time of inverted perspective that had prevented identification and formulaic description of the divergent polarity expressed by the planet's convergence with the Sun. The electron being a divergent particle knows it does not want to be lonely yet maintains freedom when converged in a relationship.

Electricity requires that tunneling (radio frequency behavior) through the atomic structure of conductors allow that electrons be exchanged from one atom to the next. What we have today is quantum tunneling that allows electrons to be waves (angular) and particles (angular + linear intererent macroscopic quantum field). This allows electrons to stay put as the potential for them to be also physically expressed by interferent linear macroscopic quantum field is suppressed.

It takes two to have a polarity. The potential differences are not always zeroed.

The current interpretation of what a blackhole is and the cosmology concerning the lifecycle of stars is entirely incorrect.

We have assumed the sun is under the effect of "gravity", cosmology states that when fusion within the sun stops ..our knowledge and mathematics determine the lack of outward pressure from fusion will cause "gravity" to form a blackhole where the star once was.

DOES ANYONE ELSE SEE THE PROBLEM?

HorseManure!!!

Oh for cryin'...

The reactions within the sun are the source of the macroscopic quantum magnetic field ..when the fuel (potential energy) supply is depleted, that is it ..no more "gravity" ..so when does the fantasy of imploding universes end? ..so the rest of us level-head folk can learn the subject and get to work.

No solar fuel, no "gravity", no blackhole and our cosmology ..I am afraid it is broken.

Next patient ..Einstein's distorted space and time. Fields? .. affirmative.

Am I too left-handed to "fall" into right-handed traps? ..and therefore continue to notice backward logic.

It seems humanity let itself explore the boundaries then include improbabilities as fact because they seem more entertaining.

Here is a neat part, the ball inside the flight instrumentation is aligned to the center of planetary mass ..any where we travel in the sphere the point of reference (inception) is communicated by the macroscopic linear quantum magnetic field (archaic: gravity).

The polarity of the planet seems to be a very slight potential difference compared to the linear macroscopic quantum magnetic field that provides a 160 mph attraction velocity toward the point of inception for spherical expression of linear attraction forces. I apologize if this seems complicated, I might as well look ahead and hone the nomenclature required. Every push a scratch from the ceiling of knowledge.