Viewing a response to: @argsolver/q7etlh
Interesting idea. I agree with the other comments that accurately determining reputation is the hard part. For example, post rewards have a difficult time actually determining valuable content... I feel like we can't solve rep until we solve this problem first.
post_id | 85,296,437 |
---|---|
author | dhimmel |
permlink | re-argsolver-q7eyy5 |
category | hive |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive"],"app":"steempeak\/2020.03.6"} |
created | 2020-03-19 00:06:06 |
last_update | 2020-03-19 00:06:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 4,712,294,726,493 |
last_payout | 2020-03-26 00:06:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.480 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.480 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 261 |
author_reputation | 33,884,415,613,920 |
root_title | "It's Time to Decentralize" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
remlaps | 0 | 32,343,054,087 | 100% | ||
remlaps1 | 0 | 505,728,638,210 | 100% | ||
remlaps2 | 0 | 5,782,248,892 | 100% | ||
dhimmel | 0 | 4,147,341,450,867 | 100% | ||
valued-customer | 0 | 16,210,621,073 | 25% | ||
remlaps-lite | 0 | 4,888,713,364 | 100% |
I have long thought that implementing something inspired by a [2nd price auction](http://www.gametheory.net/dictionary/auctions/secondpriceauction.html) for rewards in conjunction with a superlinear rewards curve (to discourage stake-splitting) would go a long way towards solving the valuation problem. Unlike today's system where a voter can maximize curation rewards by voting at maximum strength, an algorithm inspired by a 2nd price auction could drive high-powered voters to self-limit their own voting strength to accurately match the perceived value that they place on a post. Otherwise, they'd wind up wasting their voting power. Among other places, I wrote about that in [Simulating a Steem curation rewards distribution that is modeled after a 2nd price auction](/@remlaps/simulating-a-steem-curation-rewards-distribution-that-is-modeled-after-a-2nd-price-auction)
post_id | 85,298,206 |
---|---|
author | remlaps |
permlink | re-dhimmel-q7f536 |
category | hive |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive"],"app":"steempeak\/2020.03.6"} |
created | 2020-03-19 02:18:42 |
last_update | 2020-03-19 02:18:42 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 1,569,578,646,402 |
last_payout | 2020-03-26 02:18:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.136 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.135 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 878 |
author_reputation | 290,625,242,982,087 |
root_title | "It's Time to Decentralize" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dhimmel | 0 | 1,553,447,808,734 | 100% | ||
valued-customer | 0 | 16,130,837,668 | 25% |