<div class='pull-left'> <img src="https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSZJf7k3ZrKXPGxgk8B6aAZuPIdmtycC1uWRjGxPCQn5VcCbzUOkKq72yve96LrJ6cXxu4myaE"> </div> <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/are-happy-lab-animals-better-science" rel="nofollow">ScienceMagazine</a></b> - Source</p> For decades, lab animals such as rodents and fish have lived in barren enclosures: a small plastic box, fewif anycompanions, and little else. The smaller the number of variables, the thinking went, the greater the accuracy of the experiment.
| post_id | 31,977,083 |
|---|---|
| author | elveraburkh |
| permlink | are-happy-lab-animals-better-for-science |
| category | animals |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemjs/examples", "tags": []}" |
| created | 2018-02-11 22:24:45 |
| last_update | 2018-02-11 22:24:45 |
| depth | 0 |
| children | 1 |
| net_rshares | 28,567,813,626 |
| last_payout | 2018-02-18 22:24:45 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.196 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.012 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 560 |
| author_reputation | 353,002,497,285 |
| root_title | "Are happy lab animals better for science? " |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dailyquotes | 0 | 285,744,260 | 100% | ||
| sherriechau | 0 | 286,123,800 | 100% | ||
| msp-lovebot | 0 | 6,696,668,327 | 3% | ||
| msp-shanehug | 0 | 5,923,956,495 | 6% | ||
| muxxybot | 0 | 3,947,153,555 | 3% | ||
| harmannmorgan | 0 | 248,874,033 | 100% | ||
| reevaweiden | 0 | 331,831,857 | 100% | ||
| asparasjenna | 0 | 331,832,044 | 100% | ||
| schlitzrhymes | 0 | 276,526,381 | 100% | ||
| gubseribbotsona | 0 | 288,816,779 | 100% | ||
| andretoliver | 0 | 313,396,930 | 100% | ||
| johnserrano | 0 | 267,309,146 | 100% | ||
| ranseydrink | 0 | 282,671,582 | 100% | ||
| voughtbrink | 0 | 350,266,750 | 100% | ||
| bembibushie | 0 | 273,454,184 | 100% | ||
| demaskyfri | 0 | 302,437,800 | 100% | ||
| cameronray | 0 | 307,251,892 | 100% | ||
| melissalopez | 0 | 334,904,563 | 100% | ||
| jodikujath | 0 | 319,541,968 | 100% | ||
| ashleysimpson | 0 | 246,888,000 | 100% | ||
| samherrera | 0 | 330,212,700 | 100% | ||
| kimberlyglose | 0 | 280,835,100 | 100% | ||
| melissaanderson | 0 | 305,523,900 | 100% | ||
| joshuahood | 0 | 287,007,300 | 100% | ||
| toddhager | 0 | 305,523,900 | 100% | ||
| rebeccamorales | 0 | 292,277,000 | 100% | ||
| markwilliams36 | 0 | 273,817,400 | 100% | ||
| sarahclark | 0 | 326,119,600 | 100% | ||
| brookequandt | 0 | 296,265,600 | 100% | ||
| danalexis | 0 | 290,093,400 | 100% | ||
| mattgopalan | 0 | 283,921,200 | 100% | ||
| scottjohnson | 0 | 197,018,615 | 100% | ||
| curation-bidbot | 0 | 3,087,227,681 | 7.14% | ||
| viva-bg | 0 | 396,319,884 | 100% |
<p>This post has received a 7.14 % upvote from @curation-bidbot thanks to: @elveraburkh.</p>
| post_id | 31,995,017 |
|---|---|
| author | curation-bidbot |
| permlink | re-elveraburkh-are-happy-lab-animals-better-for-science-20180212t003404787z |
| category | animals |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "drotto/0.0.3", "tags": ["animals"]}" |
| created | 2018-02-12 00:34:57 |
| last_update | 2018-02-12 00:34:57 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2018-02-19 00:34:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 93 |
| author_reputation | 0 |
| root_title | "Are happy lab animals better for science? " |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |