Viewing a response to: @starkerz/pzs662
Yes, hold those reapplying to the same standards you would to a new applicant. Also perhaps don’t be afraid to ruffle feathers, as sometimes it’s needed. I know it may not be great for the projects you all are attached to and playing “nice politics” is the way to be successful on Steem.. but it doesn’t always result in the best result for the community and longevity of STEEM. Considering fundition is involved in the Steem business alliance, I hoped to see a bit more careful consideration of their past actions. The truth is one project had their delegation significantly dropped due to not living up to their business potential, and another.. whose actions speak volumes, did not. Why?
| post_id | 81,105,701 |
|---|---|
| author | justineh |
| permlink | pzs7o9 |
| category | delegationrenewal |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-22 15:14:36 |
| last_update | 2019-10-22 15:14:36 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 5 |
| net_rshares | -734,672,594,461 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-29 15:14:36 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 696 |
| author_reputation | 150,583,635,427,983 |
| root_title | "Delegation Renewal Recommendations to Steemit" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ranchorelaxo | 0 | -1,030,867,220,058 | -4% | ||
| joshman | 0 | 90,920,598,490 | 5% | ||
| wehmoen | 0 | 205,274,027,107 | 100% |
Understood. Please note our approach is a bit softer than what you describe above. We have discussed a lot about how to approach this, and we are phasing this system in. There is no need to make decisions that could appear too harsh at this phase. We have however communicated that things are changing and have given projects enough warning to be ready for that change, especially in the next phase of delegation applications, which will bring in new projects / delegations and set a more competitive standard. The end result you are looking for will be more or less the same, but the changes will be implemented over a slightly longer time frame so as to give projects time to adjust, rather than just remove delegations immediately. As regards to Fundition and drug wars, fundition is a great project for steem, and we must do what we can to incentivize it to get going again, maybe bring in some sort of business model. We would like to give some time to see if this can be achieved before decisions are made to reduce the delegation. We do not want a great project to sit quiet and dead on the steem blockchain if we can at least try to get it kick started again.
| post_id | 81,107,923 |
|---|---|
| author | starkerz |
| permlink | pzsb1f |
| category | delegationrenewal |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-22 16:27:18 |
| last_update | 2019-10-22 16:27:18 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 4 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-29 16:27:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 1,176 |
| author_reputation | 27,968,338,463,090 |
| root_title | "Delegation Renewal Recommendations to Steemit" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Yes, fundition *could* be a good project.. but if you actually have to bribe or force them to do what they were supposed to be doing all along (while collecting a big check from community funds), instead of the bs they were.. then maybe it’s better to start fresh and build this thing you all see as valuable. The only thing fundition has that’s unique is they already have a website. Pretty sure anyone could build that with 1M SP. Seems quite strange to give them a pass because they *could* *maybe* do something of value. Glad you are trying to go about this in a fair and logical way, but at some point it’s just being complacent and setting a bad precedent.
| post_id | 81,109,196 |
|---|---|
| author | justineh |
| permlink | pzsdj0 |
| category | delegationrenewal |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-22 17:21:03 |
| last_update | 2019-10-22 17:21:03 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 3 |
| net_rshares | -1,031,677,538,656 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-29 17:21:03 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 668 |
| author_reputation | 150,583,635,427,983 |
| root_title | "Delegation Renewal Recommendations to Steemit" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ranchorelaxo | 0 | -1,031,677,538,656 | -4% |
If we do this in a corrupt way or repeat the same warning again and again, without taking any action then I can understand ur point. We are not there yet however
| post_id | 81,109,461 |
|---|---|
| author | starkerz |
| permlink | pzse51 |
| category | delegationrenewal |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-22 17:34:15 |
| last_update | 2019-10-22 17:34:15 |
| depth | 7 |
| children | 2 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-29 17:34:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 161 |
| author_reputation | 27,968,338,463,090 |
| root_title | "Delegation Renewal Recommendations to Steemit" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |