RE: LOL: Voice isn't going to be on EOS? by markkujantunen

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @edicted/lol-voice-isn-t-going-to-be-on-eos

· @markkujantunen · (edited)
$0.03
Voice only stores a hash of the identification information (government issued ID + biometrics). While a hash function meant to be a one-way encryption function, there is no guarantee how fast the price of computing power will drop in the future for the ID hashes on Voice to stay irreversible. Imagine large quantum computers becoming reality and cheap enough in the next couple of decades.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id83,522,695
authormarkkujantunen
permlinkre-edicted-q49u7y
categoryvoice
json_metadata{"tags":["voice"],"app":"steempeak\/2.2.7"}
created2020-01-17 21:55:15
last_update2020-01-17 21:55:57
depth1
children4
net_rshares209,721,230,510
last_payout2020-01-24 21:55:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 SBD
curator_payout_value0.016 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length390
author_reputation340,582,416,232,499
root_title"LOL: Voice isn't going to be on EOS? "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@edicted ·
I'm not really worried about how the information is stored (security), but rather how easy it will be to falsify fake identities.   If we look at the tenants and ideology of decentralization it's an obvious step in the wrong direction imo.
properties (22)
post_id83,522,842
authoredicted
permlinkq49umr
categoryvoice
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2020-01-17 22:04:06
last_update2020-01-17 22:04:06
depth2
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2020-01-24 22:04:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length239
author_reputation171,132,830,416,177
root_title"LOL: Voice isn't going to be on EOS? "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@markkujantunen ·
$0.03
Would you clarify that idea a bit, please? How are fake identities in contradiction with the tenets and ideology of decentralization or how does that advance something that contradicts the tenets and ideology of decentralization?
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id83,522,883
authormarkkujantunen
permlinkre-edicted-q49us3
categoryvoice
json_metadata{"tags":["voice"],"app":"steempeak\/2.2.7"}
created2020-01-17 22:07:15
last_update2020-01-17 22:07:15
depth3
children2
net_rshares223,031,252,092
last_payout2020-01-24 22:07:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 SBD
curator_payout_value0.017 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length229
author_reputation340,582,416,232,499
root_title"LOL: Voice isn't going to be on EOS? "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@edicted ·
I think KYC itself is against the spirit of decentralization.  I don't think monetizing personhood is a good idea, and the entire concept of one-person one-vote is flawed to the core.  The establishment has already perfected the exploits of one-person one-vote in the form of democratic republics.  Anyone with financial resources can simply pay to change the perceptions of a percentage of the masses to align with the agenda presented.  Voice is trying to implement a broken system that's already been cracked.  Mob rule isn't a good form of governance.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
post_id83,523,229
authoredicted
permlinkq49vtx
categoryvoice
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2020-01-17 22:30:00
last_update2020-01-17 22:30:00
depth4
children1
net_rshares98,421,126,761
last_payout2020-01-24 22:30:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length555
author_reputation171,132,830,416,177
root_title"LOL: Voice isn't going to be on EOS? "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)