HF21: Sigh by numpypython

View this thread on steempeak.com
· @numpypython ·
$1.05
HF21: Sigh
![image.png](https://ipfs.busy.org/ipfs/Qme2GwpVbT8fJMLBmgsD7bTt1J1opvAzoX5jjebp2RkVMw)


Ok by now there are enough posts that explain what HF21 is all about so i won't rehash that. I've mentioned in a couple of my comments that I think the EIP bit is misguided and i'd like to explain why. 

Everyone can see that curation on Steemit is broken. Your payout is determined by your network and rarely by the quality of your post. So how would changing the rewards split to 50-50 solve that? If someone close to a whale was getting $10 a post, he'll now $5 a post regardless of how good that post is. Meanwhile, someone who doesn't have a network will now get half of his current pittance. 

I've simplified the number calculations but it'll be a major decrease in the earnings.

## Voting behavior

Oh but you're not factoring in the change of voting behavior that's going to happen! That's a big assumption - that whales aren't actively curating because they aren't rewarded enough and that by rewarding them double, they're going to become active and discerning curators.

The thing is, a whale is like a central banker or head of a major nation, in that they move the market. If a whale says a post is good and worth $10, then it is worth more than a thousand real minnow upvotes. They don't need to care about quality at all.

## Case in point

There are folks making 10 posts a day each getting a whale upvote and making around $15 a post. That's $150 a day on pretty much thin regurgitated content. Instead of powering up, they power down the entire amount they've earned over the week. 

Please tell me how HF21 will solve this? They now have to do 20 posts instead of 10?

## Steem value

Steem's value has been dropping and shows no sign of getting back to it's top 30 status. It's both a demand problem and a supply problem.  HF21 pretty much wipes out minnows, and maybe even the smaller dolphins. 

HF21 also doesn't address the fact that concentrated steem power earns way more steem than they know what to do with and will obviously sell it to diversify their risk or invest elsewhere thus driving down the price of steem.  
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 102 others
properties (23)
post_id76,715,218
authornumpypython
permlinkhf21-sigh
categorybusy
json_metadata{"community":"busy","app":"busy\/2.5.6","format":"markdown","tags":["busy","palnet","blog","rant"],"users":[],"links":[],"image":["https:\/\/ipfs.busy.org\/ipfs\/Qme2GwpVbT8fJMLBmgsD7bTt1J1opvAzoX5jjebp2RkVMw"]}
created2019-06-20 12:22:15
last_update2019-06-20 12:22:15
depth0
children8
net_rshares1,861,207,519,161
last_payout2019-06-27 12:22:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.826 SBD
curator_payout_value0.228 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length2,137
author_reputation49,481,680,921,551
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (166)
@fullcoverbetting ·
$0.06
HF21 will only hurt the little ones and make the bigger ones stronger! They are just trying to protect their investment. Maybe the steem value will stay the same, but they will just get more of it!
It is an illusion that due to this change the whales and orcas will change their behaviour! Maybe they will. They will just use services like steemauto not letting their VP go to waste. But they will only support a few people, probably people with the same amount of SP.
The bidbots will not be killed, they will just get stronger and will get more delegations than ever. Delegation to those will double the ROI compared to now. They will change the way how the upvote will be calculated so that there is still a potential ROI for their users.New curation bots will be born, which will vote on the posts of their delegators once a day, according to the delegation. The profit will be shared among the delegators on the owner!
I do feel that the 50/50 will kill a lot od authors, it will increase the retention rate!
And there is nothing much we can do about it!
I did remove a lot of votes for witnesses who are in favor of the 50/50 split (some still have my vote regardless of the Yes, but that is because they are supporting or developing great things for the blockchain). That is the only thing I can do!
Great post and in line what I did write today in min!

Cheers,
Peter
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id76,715,884
authorfullcoverbetting
permlinkre-numpypython-hf21-sigh-20190620t123645992z
categorybusy
json_metadata{"community":"busy","app":"busy\/2.5.6","format":"markdown","tags":["busy"],"users":[],"links":[]}
created2019-06-20 12:36:57
last_update2019-06-20 12:36:57
depth1
children2
net_rshares112,547,585,510
last_payout2019-06-27 12:36:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.048 SBD
curator_payout_value0.015 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,376
author_reputation95,255,242,917,677
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@numpypython · (edited)
$0.05
Thanks, Peter. Well said and i completely agree with your earlier post as well where you explained the numbers. 

Ultimately, this EIP will only benefit a select few at the expense of everyone else. Will be interesting to see how the Steem price reacts.

Edit: Only two of my witness votes are in the top 20 but if either vote 'yes' i will remove my vote for them.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id76,716,467
authornumpypython
permlinkpteenx
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-20 12:57:36
last_update2019-06-20 12:58:30
depth2
children0
net_rshares77,326,523,004
last_payout2019-06-27 12:57:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.034 SBD
curator_payout_value0.011 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length364
author_reputation49,481,680,921,551
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@crypto.piotr ·
Dear @fullcoverbetting

> HF21 will only hurt the little ones and make the bigger ones stronger!

Indeed. 

> Maybe the steem value will stay the same, but they will just get more of it!

Most likely price of STEEM will increase in short term, simply because powering down will surely slow down as many people will seek opportunities to double their profits as "curators".

> It is an illusion that due to this change the whales and orcas will change their behaviour! Maybe they will. 

This system can only work if so called Whales would actually start delegating their Steem Power to quality curators. That would indeed allow those curators to be rewarded for their work and benefit entire platoform.

I'm simply afraid, that this will not happen. That at the end most whales will continue auto-upvoting publications of very few people, with their powerful votes and without putting any effort they will start earning x2 more than they did so far.

It surely would encourage them to slow down with powering down, which in effect would most likely bring up the price of STEEM. But that is the only positive outcome. And what would happen year from now, when those "whales" would start dumping this easily earned STEEM? 

Yours
Piotr
properties (22)
post_id76,842,184
authorcrypto.piotr
permlinkptige7
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"users":["fullcoverbetting"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-22 17:25:12
last_update2019-06-22 17:25:12
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-06-29 17:25:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,233
author_reputation126,215,040,536,555
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
@costanza ·
$0.06
It might very much wipe out many of the dolphins, pretty much everyone that has been active on the platform getting something going building their own account will get screwed if this hardfork gets a pass. I hope they just give up on making it all about 'quality content'
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id76,732,610
authorcostanza
permlinkpteuve
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-20 18:47:39
last_update2019-06-20 18:47:39
depth1
children2
net_rshares114,072,454,592
last_payout2019-06-27 18:47:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.049 SBD
curator_payout_value0.015 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length271
author_reputation89,582,302,801,873
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@numpypython ·
$0.05
Indeed, Costanza. This would seem to penalize the more active smaller accounts than anything. One thing i dislike about this whole thing is how they are trying to pass it off as an attempt to improve Steemit when it's just a way to enrich the large stakeholders.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id76,744,272
authornumpypython
permlinkptf7ws
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-20 23:29:18
last_update2019-06-20 23:29:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares78,150,657,460
last_payout2019-06-27 23:29:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.034 SBD
curator_payout_value0.011 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length262
author_reputation49,481,680,921,551
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@crypto.piotr ·
Hard not to agree with your comment @costanza

Im about to read your latest post "HardFork 21 = Dolphin Killer ?". The title is an excellent clickbait :)

Yours
Piotr
properties (22)
post_id76,842,049
authorcrypto.piotr
permlinkptig7r
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"users":["costanza"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-22 17:21:21
last_update2019-06-22 17:21:21
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-06-29 17:21:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length166
author_reputation126,215,040,536,555
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
@crypto.piotr ·
Dear @numpypython

> That's a big assumption - that whales aren't actively curating because they aren't rewarded enough and that by rewarding them double, they're going to become active and discerning curators.

Indeed. 

This system can only work if so called Whales would actually start delegating their Steem Power to quality curators. That would indeed allow those curators to be rewarded for their work and benefit entire platoform.

I'm simply afraid, that this will not happen. That at the end most whales will continue auto-upvoting publications of very few people, with their powerful votes and without putting any effort they will start earning x2 more than they did so far.

It surely would encourage them to slow down with powering down, which in effect would most likely bring up the price of STEEM. But that is the only positive outcome. And what would happen year from now, when those "whales" would start dumping this easily earned STEEM? 

Yours
Piotr
👍  
properties (23)
post_id76,841,943
authorcrypto.piotr
permlinkptig3x
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"users":["numpypython"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-22 17:19:03
last_update2019-06-22 17:19:03
depth1
children1
net_rshares32,716,792,834
last_payout2019-06-29 17:19:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length968
author_reputation126,215,040,536,555
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@numpypython ·
Yes, that's what i see happening too. Ultimately, it's an economic problem we see in the real world as well, when too much money ends up in too few hands. 

Just look at Saudi Arabia, China, Russia. They end up taking that easily printed money out of the country and buy up property in Australia, Vancouver, London etc.
properties (22)
post_id76,859,854
authornumpypython
permlinkptj0fp
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-23 00:38:15
last_update2019-06-23 00:38:15
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-06-30 00:38:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length319
author_reputation49,481,680,921,551
root_title"HF21: Sigh"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000