Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence by paulag

View this thread on steempeak.com
· @paulag · (edited)
$181.89
Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence
In a previous analysis, I looked at transactions on the SmartCash MasterNode Blockchain and compared it to Crave MasterNode Blockchain.  I also took some time to explore ZCoin versus SmartCash.

If you missed those posts you can check them out here:
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@paulag/exploring-smartcash-and-crave-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence

https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@paulag/exploring-and-comparing-zcoin-and-smartcash-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence

On a quest to make more MasterNode data comparisons, today we are going to compare Crave with Monoeci.

Both Crave and Monoeci are MasterNode coins. Both coins also have API which will allow me call transactions into PowerBI for analysis.

Monoeci if successful could make an awesome case study for cryptocurrency as it is a local coin for Monaco.  You can find out more on their website https://monoeci.io/en/home/

Crave is a payment system that focuses on anonymity and privacy of its users, including features such as the Zerocoin Protocol and LightX instant send.  Do check out their website for more information https://www.craveproject.net/

I have selected these two coins to compare because they both have a very comparable market cap and the return on investment for hosting a MasterNode is also very similar.

## Aim of Analysis
The aim of this analysis was
•	To explore the data presented in the public API for Crave
•	See what insights this data can provide
•	To explore the data presented in the public API for Monoeci
•	See what insights this data can provide
•	Compare Crave to Monoeci

## Crave Data

 ![1.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/93fa22fa36ccd2880c7646e44bfa11c48de71.png)


As with APIs previously analysed for MasterNode coins, this API returns the last 100 transactions. However, these 100 transactions do not include MasterNode or Staking rewards. This was the first MasterNode APIs that I had looked where MasterNode rewards were not included. It is my opinion, by excluding MN transactions gives a true representation of actual usage on the block.

The last 100 transactions on the blockchain were made up of 539 line items. These 100 transactions moved 2.17 BTC worth of Crave from 218 unique addresses to 90 unique addresses.

These 100 transactions took place over 91K seconds. That equates to 0.0011 transactions per second.

The values shown in light purple relate to data from Coinmarketcap. At the time of analysis, the price of crave was $0.22581 USD.

Information from MasterNodes.online for Crave is shown below

![2.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/3bf0f873a8d5d7df281a670904fe8d9a05dd2.png)

 
## Monoeci Data

![3.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/c3c26d0ac6335ebec48f093082f58214a7e13.png)

 
The last 100 transactions on the Monoeci blockchain returned by the API also does not contain MasterNode rewards.  Delighted as this make the comparison a lot easier.
In total, the 100 transactions took place in 139K seconds, so this works out to be 0.0014 transactions per second.

The last 100 transactions on the blockchain were made up of 1205 line items. These 100 transactions moved 5.6 BTC worth of Monoeci from 466 unique addresses to 336 unique addresses.
The values shown in light purple relate to data from Coinmarketcap. At the time of analysis, the price of Monoeci was $0.92 USD.

Information from MasterNodes.online for Monoeci is shown below:

![4.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/dac2a4049e04c1817766ed5b902233036cac4.png)

 
## Comparison
A Crave MasterNode will costs you 23% more than a Monoeci MasterNode, as a Monoeci Node requires 1,000 coins and a Crave node require 5,000 coins. Coin for coin at the time of analysis Crave will cost you 75% less than Monoeci.

There is also 195% more volume traded on exchanges of Crave than Monoeci. However, the Crave supply is 86% greater than that of Monoeci. Of the full supply, 52.48% of Monoeci are locked in. Whereas with Crave 35.5% of coins are locked in.

Has the higher supply and the lower % locked in with Crave led to an increase in trade volume on exchanges due to more liquidity?

Crave processed 0.0011 transactions per second, whereas Monoeci processed 0.0014. This makes the Monoeci blockchain 1.27X more active than Crave for transactions and it also moves 1.69X in BTC equivalent per minute.

## Conclusion
MasterNode Coins were tipped as the hot thing for 2018 but wading through the rake of MasterNode coins to find good ones can be a difficult task. As the price of crypto was on a downtrend for so long, now might be a good time to consider an investment in a MasterNode.

Comparing the data from one MasterNode blockchain against another can provide useful insights that can be combine with other available data as I have done in this analysis.  In this analysis we looked at 4 data sources, 2 blockchains, coinmarketcap and MasterNodes.online.  By combining this data, a more detailed comparison can be made in one place.

I am surprised to see that the Monoeci blockchain is 1.27X more active and Crave but coin for coin, Monoeci is 300% more expensive. To me this would suggest that either Monoeci is overvalued or Crave is undervalued.

## The Data and Query
The query was pulled at 29 April 2018 21:30 GMT.

The final M code used in Power BI query editor for Monoeci was:

``` language
let
Source = Json.Document(Web.Contents("https://explorer3.Monoeci.cc/ext/getlasttxs/10/100")),
#"Converted to Table" = Record.ToTable(Source),
#"Expanded Value" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Converted to Table", "Value"),
#"Expanded Value1" = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(#"Expanded Value", "Value", {"_id", "txid", 
"blockhash", "__v", "blockindex", "timestamp", "total", "vout", "vin"}, {"_id", "txid", "blockhash", "__v", 
"blockindex", "timestamp", "total", "vout", "vin"}),
#"Expanded vout" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Expanded Value1", "vout"),
#"Expanded vout1" = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(#"Expanded vout", "vout", {"addresses", 
"amount"}, {"addresses", "amount"}),
#"Expanded addresses" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Expanded vout1", "addresses"),
  #"Renamed Columns" = Table.RenameColumns(#"Expanded addresses",{{"addresses", "Rec 
address"}}),
  #"Expanded vin" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Renamed Columns", "vin"),
 #"Expanded vin1" = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(#"Expanded vin", "vin", {"addresses", "amount"}, 
 {"addresses.1", "amount.1"}),
  #"Renamed Columns1" = Table.RenameColumns(#"Expanded vin1",{{"addresses.1", "Sending 
  address"}, {"amount", "sent amt"}, {"amount.1", "rec amt"}}),
  #"Added Custom" = Table.AddColumn(#"Renamed Columns1", "total SMART sent value", each 
  [sent amt]/100000000),
   #"Added Custom1" = Table.AddColumn(#"Added Custom", "total SMART Rec value", each [rec 
   amt]/100000000),
   #"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Added Custom1",{{"total SMART Rec value",   
   type number}, {"total SMART sent value", type number}, {"rec amt", type number}, {"sent amt", type 
   number}, {"total", type number}, {"timestamp", type number}, {"blockindex", type number}}),
   #"Added Custom2" = Table.AddColumn(#"Changed Type", "coin", each "SMART")
  in
  #"Added Custom2"
```

The final M code used in Power BI query editor for Crave was:

``` language
let
Source = 
 Json.Document(Web.Contents("http://explorer.craveproject.net/ext/getlasttxs/10/100")),
  #"Converted to Table" = Record.ToTable(Source),
  #"Expanded Value" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Converted to Table", "Value"),
  #"Expanded Value1" = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(#"Expanded Value", "Value", {"_id", "txid", 
 "blockhash", "__v", "blockindex", "timestamp", "total", "vout", "vin"}, {"_id", "txid", "blockhash", "__v", 
 "blockindex", "timestamp", "total", "vout", "vin"}),
  #"Expanded vout" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Expanded Value1", "vout"),
  #"Expanded vout1" = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(#"Expanded vout", "vout", {"addresses", 
   "amount"}, {"addresses", "amount"}),
  #"Renamed Columns" = Table.RenameColumns(#"Expanded vout1",{{"addresses", "rec. address"}}),
  #"Added Custom2" = Table.AddColumn(#"Renamed Columns", "Coin", each "CRAVE"),
  #"Removed Columns" = Table.RemoveColumns(#"Added Custom2",{"vin"}),
   #"Added Custom" = Table.AddColumn(#"Removed Columns", "Rec Amt Crave", each 
   [amount]/100000000),
   #"Appended Query" = Table.Combine({#"Added Custom", #"crave (2)"}),
  #"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Appended Query",{{"sending amt crave", type 
 number}, {"sending amount", type number}, {"Rec Amt Crave", type number}, {"amount", type 
  number}})
   in
  #"Changed Type"
```

To get live data from Coinmarketcap, I also connected to the live ticker API for each of the coins and then carried out an append on each of the tables.  The final M code used in Power BI query editor was:

``` language
 let
 Source = Json.Document(Web.Contents("https://api.coinmarketcap.com/v1/ticker/crave/")),
  #"Converted to Table" = Table.FromList(Source, Splitter.SplitByNothing(), null, null, 
  ExtraValues.Error),
  #"Expanded Column1" = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(#"Converted to Table", "Column1", {"id", 
  "name", "symbol", "rank", "price_usd", "price_btc", "24h_volume_usd", "market_cap_usd", 
 "available_supply", "total_supply", "max_supply", "percent_change_1h", "percent_change_24h", 
  "percent_change_7d", "last_updated"}, {"id", "name", "symbol", "rank", "price_usd", "price_btc", 
 "24h_volume_usd", "market_cap_usd", "available_supply", "total_supply", "max_supply", " 
    percent_change_1h", "percent_change_24h", "percent_change_7d", "last_updated"}),
   #"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Expanded Column1",{{"rank", type number}, 
  {"price_usd", type number}, {"price_btc", type number}, {"total_supply", type number}, 
  {"24h_volume_usd", type number}, {"market_cap_usd", type number}}),
#"Appended Query" = Table.Combine({#"Changed Type", #"ticker (2)", #"ticker (3)"}),
 #"Appended Query1" = Table.Combine({#"Appended Query", #"ticker (4)"})
 in
 #"Appended Query1"
```

Once I had gathered all the data, I then carried out many calculations using DAX.

I am part of a Blockchain Business Intelligence community. We all post under the tag #blockchainbi. If you have an analysis you would like carried out on Steemit data, please do contact me or any of the #blockchainbi team and we will do our best to help you...

You can find #blockchainbi on discord https://discordapp.com/invite/JN7Yv7j
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 5 others
properties (23)
post_id46,266,771
authorpaulag
permlinkexploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"staff_pick": null, "platform": "github", "config": {"questions": [{"question": "Were all relevant aspects or metrics related to the objective analyzed?", "answers": [{"answer": "All relevant metrics were covered.", "value": 25, "answer_id": "analysis-1-a-1"}, {"answer": "Only selected metrics were chosen; including more may have provided additional insights.", "value": 20, "answer_id": "analysis-1-a-2"}, {"answer": "Only a single or narrow aspect was chosen.", "value": 10, "answer_id": "analysis-1-a-3"}, {"answer": "No metric was chosen.", "value": 0, "answer_id": "analysis-1-a-4"}], "question_id": "analysis-1"}, {"question": "How would you rate the complexity data extraction for this analysis?", "answers": [{"answer": "Gathering the data required complex queries and post-processing.", "value": 15, "answer_id": "analysis-2-a-1"}, {"answer": "The method of extracting data was moderately challenging.", "value": 12, "answer_id": "analysis-2-a-2"}, {"answer": "The data can be directly imported for visualization - no additional data transformation was needed.", "value": 6, "answer_id": "analysis-2-a-3"}, {"answer": "No data was extracted.", "value": 0, "answer_id": "analysis-2-a-4"}], "question_id": "analysis-2"}, {"question": "How would you rate the quality of the visualization of the findings?", "answers": [{"answer": "Visualizations presented were superb and beyond expectation.", "value": 20, "answer_id": "analysis-3-a-1"}, {"answer": "Appropriate and sufficient visualization were used to present the results.", "value": 16, "answer_id": "analysis-3-a-2"}, {"answer": "Visualizations were included, but lacked in quality and/or quantity.", "value": 8, "answer_id": "analysis-3-a-3"}, {"answer": "Visualizations included were irrelevant to the objective.", "value": 0, "answer_id": "analysis-3-a-4"}], "question_id": "analysis-3"}, {"question": "Was the analysis reproducible through the use of the contribution content?", "answers": [{"answer": "All queries or data gathering methods and all data processing scripts were included.", "value": 5, "answer_id": "analysis-4-a-1"}, {"answer": "The core query or data gathering method was included and the data processing steps were described.", "value": 4, "answer_id": "analysis-4-a-2"}, {"answer": "Data gathering methods and processing steps were sketched.", "value": 2, "answer_id": "analysis-4-a-3"}, {"answer": "Data gathering methods were not included.", "value": 0, "answer_id": "analysis-4-a-4"}], "question_id": "analysis-4"}, {"question": "Was it a new and unique analysis?", "answers": [{"answer": "Yes, it was a unique analysis.", "value": 5, "answer_id": "analysis-5-a-1"}, {"answer": "It\u2019s similar to another contribution, but covers deeper or additional aspects.", "value": 4, "answer_id": "analysis-5-a-2"}, {"answer": "It\u2019s similar to another contribution, but covers a different time period.", "value": 4, "answer_id": "analysis-5-a-3"}, {"answer": "It\u2019s a recurring analysis covering too short a time frame (i.e., daily).", "value": 0, "answer_id": "analysis-5-a-4"}], "question_id": "analysis-5"}, {"question": "How would you describe the formatting, language and overall presentation of the post?", "answers": [{"answer": "The post is of very high quality.", "value": 10, "answer_id": "c-1-a-1"}, {"answer": "The post is of decent quality, but not spectacular in any way.", "value": 7, "answer_id": "c-1-a-2"}, {"answer": "The post is poorly written and/or formatted, but readable.", "value": 3, "answer_id": "c-1-a-3"}, {"answer": "The post is really hard to read and the content is barely understandable.", "value": 0, "answer_id": "c-1-a-4"}], "question_id": "c-1"}, {"question": "How would you rate the overall value of this contribution on the open source community and ecosystem?", "answers": [{"answer": "This contribution brings great and impactful value, and can be used for applications outside the specific project.", "value": 20, "answer_id": "c-2-a-1"}, {"answer": "This contribution adds significant value to the open source community and ecosystem, or is of critical importance to the specific project.", "value": 16, "answer_id": "c-2-a-2"}, {"answer": "This contribution adds some value to the open source community and ecosystem or is only valuable to the specific project.", "value": 8, "answer_id": "c-2-a-3"}, {"answer": "This contribution adds no value to the open source community and ecosystem or the specific project.", "value": 0, "answer_id": "c-2-a-4"}], "question_id": "c-2"}]}, "pullRequests": [], "users": ["paulag"], "staff_pick_by": null, "questions": null, "app": "utopian/1.0.0", "score": null, "type": "analysis", "links": ["https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/93fa22fa36ccd2880c7646e44bfa11c48de71.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/3bf0f873a8d5d7df281a670904fe8d9a05dd2.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/c3c26d0ac6335ebec48f093082f58214a7e13.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/dac2a4049e04c1817766ed5b902233036cac4.png"], "moderator": {"time": "2018-05-01T11:12:08.420Z", "pending": false, "reviewed": true, "flagged": false, "account": "crokkon"}, "community": "utopian", "tags": ["utopian-io", "cryptocurrency", "crave", "masternodes", "blockchainbi"], "total_influence": null, "repository": {"full_name": "Crave-Project/Crave-NG", "owner": {"login": "Crave-Project"}, "id": 121510515, "fork": false, "html_url": "https://github.com/Crave-Project/Crave-NG", "name": "Crave-NG"}, "image": ["https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/93fa22fa36ccd2880c7646e44bfa11c48de71.png"], "format": "markdown"}"
created2018-04-30 22:33:51
last_update2018-05-01 11:12:12
depth0
children13
net_rshares34,806,036,306,796
last_payout2018-05-07 22:33:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value136.657 SBD
curator_payout_value45.228 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length10,388
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries
0.
weight1,500
accountutopian.pay
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (69)
@smokeasare165 ·
@paulag that is an interesting chat you have there
properties (22)
post_id46,267,629
authorsmokeasare165
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180430t224125932z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["paulag"], "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-30 22:41:27
last_update2018-04-30 22:41:27
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-07 22:41:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length50
author_reputation514,175,182,768
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sequentialvibe ·
Incredible analysis. I had no idea about Crave and Monaco. So cool!
properties (22)
post_id46,267,756
authorsequentialvibe
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180430t224233007z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/2.4.0", "community": "busy", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-30 22:42:33
last_update2018-04-30 22:42:33
depth1
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-07 22:42:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length67
author_reputation38,508,407,201,933
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@paulag ·
its really interesting exploring the different blockchains
properties (22)
post_id46,597,428
authorpaulag
permlinkre-sequentialvibe-re-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180502t183808176z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-02 18:38:06
last_update2018-05-02 18:38:06
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-09 18:38:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length58
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@donjerro ·
Love your analysis dear.  I have been thinking of investing in masternode.  Thanks for the exposure.
properties (22)
post_id46,268,955
authordonjerro
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180430t225306085z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-30 22:53:09
last_update2018-04-30 22:53:09
depth1
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-07 22:53:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length100
author_reputation3,981,071,705
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@paulag ·
I have also been thinking about it, crave seems to be a good option I think
properties (22)
post_id46,597,500
authorpaulag
permlinkre-donjerro-re-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180502t183836536z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-02 18:38:36
last_update2018-05-02 18:38:36
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-09 18:38:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length75
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tfq86 ·
i don't understand about what are you talking about @paulag. just wanna say, everything you wanna do, hopefully goes well.
properties (22)
post_id46,269,474
authortfq86
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180430t225813360z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["paulag"], "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-30 22:58:18
last_update2018-04-30 22:58:18
depth1
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-07 22:58:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length122
author_reputation7,683,437,369,949
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@paulag ·
ha ha love it, at least you are honest.  So steem is a coin on the steem blockchain.  the coins above also have their own blockchains and I am just analyzing the transactions
properties (22)
post_id46,597,626
authorpaulag
permlinkre-tfq86-re-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180502t183935885z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-02 18:39:33
last_update2018-05-02 18:39:33
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-09 18:39:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length174
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tfq86 ·
what a great work you did...
you really awesome. i don't know what a better Word to state you. 😀😀😀
properties (22)
post_id46,598,085
authortfq86
permlinkre-paulag-re-tfq86-re-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180502t184319493z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-02 18:43:24
last_update2018-05-02 18:43:24
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-09 18:43:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length98
author_reputation7,683,437,369,949
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@coin.info ·
**Coins mentioned in post:**

Coin | | Price (USD) | 📉 24h | 📉 7d
- | - | - | - | -
**BTC** | Bitcoin | 8957.150$ | _-3.99%_ | _-2.61%_
**MCO** | Monaco | 11.106$ | _-6.7%_ | _-14.1%_
**SMART** | SmartCash | 0.136$ | _-1.69%_ | _-25.65%_
**XZC** | ZCoin | 42.042$ | _-5.75%_ | _-10.21%_
properties (22)
post_id46,314,771
authorcoin.info
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180501t055550510z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "coininfo/1.0.0", "format": "markdown"}"
created2018-05-01 05:55:51
last_update2018-05-01 05:55:51
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-08 05:55:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length286
author_reputation133,181,666,357
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@ziapase ·
Great analysis, I can not afford to be like you !
properties (22)
post_id46,317,305
authorziapase
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180501t061651731z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-01 06:17:06
last_update2018-05-01 06:17:06
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-08 06:17:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length49
author_reputation1,031,177,274,593
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@crokkon ·
Hi @paulag, very interesting comparison! Did you investigate why there were no MN rewards in the data? Maybe filtered by the API or handled otherwise? I'm also a bit surprised by the time span of the last 100 transactions. With block times of 60 and 120s this means that a large majority of blocks must be empty for those coins?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io.
Chat with us on [Discord](https://discord.gg/uTyJkNm).

**[[utopian-moderator]](https://utopian.io/moderators)**
properties (22)
post_id46,353,827
authorcrokkon
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180501t112034192z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "utopian/1.0.0", "community": "utopian", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-01 11:20:36
last_update2018-05-01 11:20:36
depth1
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-08 11:20:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length570
author_reputation75,470,595,669,689
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries
0.
weight1,500
accountutopian.pay
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@paulag ·
$1.17
hi @crokkon, yes I did investigate because crave was the first one and I thought I made a mistake somehow.  So I went to the developers and confirmed with them the data contained within their apis.

The blocks are not empty as they do include MN rewards and staking rewards but other than that you would be correct in assuming no transactions are happening.  Thanks for bringing this up as I can use it in future analysis as a comparison metric.  Some sort of value per block
👍  
properties (23)
post_id46,365,198
authorpaulag
permlinkre-crokkon-re-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180501t124136408z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["crokkon"], "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-01 12:41:36
last_update2018-05-01 12:41:36
depth2
children0
net_rshares202,333,095,375
last_payout2018-05-08 12:41:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.880 SBD
curator_payout_value0.292 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length475
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@utopian-io ·
$4.11
#### Hey @paulag
We're already looking forward to your next contribution!
##### Decentralised Rewards
Share your expertise and knowledge by rating contributions made by others on Utopian.io to help us reward the best contributions together.
##### Utopian Witness!
<a href="https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=utopian-io&approve=1">Vote for Utopian Witness!</a> We are made of developers, system administrators, entrepreneurs, artists, content creators, thinkers. We embrace every nationality, mindset and belief.

**Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.me/utopian-io**
👍  
properties (23)
post_id46,625,921
authorutopian-io
permlinkre-paulag-exploring-and-comparing-crave-and-monoeci-blockchain-data-blockchain-business-intelligence-20180502t224042401z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "utopian/1.0.0", "community": "utopian", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-05-02 22:40:42
last_update2018-05-02 22:40:42
depth1
children0
net_rshares739,483,959,040
last_payout2018-05-09 22:40:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value4.114 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length606
author_reputation152,913,012,544,965
root_title"Exploring and Comparing Crave and Monoeci BlockChain Data - BlockChain Business Intelligence"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)