March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI by paulag

View this thread on steempeak.com
· @paulag · (edited)
$10.83
March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI
**Zappl** is a fun app built upon the Steem Blockchain that allows you earn STEEM by posting or up voting on short form content up to 240 characters that are just like tweets.

Zappl was previously in receipt of funding Steemit Inc by way of delegation from Misterdelegation. However this funding has now been revoked.

The aim of this analysis is to monitor the monthly activity from @Zappl in terms of voting. It is also to analyse posts made via the Zappl app and posts made to the Zappl category on the STEEM Blockchain.

This analysis will be carried out on a monthly basis so that trends can be established and growth measured.
If you missed last months post you can read it here
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@paulag/feb-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi

## The Data
Using PowerBI, I have connected to the SteemSQL database (paid subscription service held and managed by @arcange). You can find the full query at the end of this post.


## The Analysis

### March @Zappl Votes Analysis

 ![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/0e519bf440fc188a22c71a39c86873946315image.png)

The visualization above show the voting for @zappl in March 2018.

In March 2018 Zappl voted 15K times for 4339 Authors. The average vote pay out was SBD $1 and the total approx. pay out given by Zappl was SBD $40.06 We can also see from above that the average % voting weight used by @Zappl was .69% and the average number of votes given per day was 483.

We can see also that the voting from @zappl came to an almost complete halt after the 11th March.
In addition to this the vote value reduced from $103.45 to only $0.40 as the delegation was removed by Misterdelegation

For comparison Feb 2018 Zappl voted 26K times for 4480 Authors. The average vote pay out was SBD $1 and the total approx. pay out given by Zappl was SBD $24.17K We can also see from above that the average % voting weight used by @Zappl was .89% and the average number of votes given per day was 928.

### March Voting Time Series

 ![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/3b5fcc0320af508cbecb34cfa86830208d28image.png)

The time series above shows the No of Authors, No of Votes, Average SBD value and the average voting weight used by @zappl each day during the reporting period.  It is disappointing to see the drop off in votes, although I am sure this is down to the removal of delegation.

### Popular Steemains in terms of Upvotes from @Zappl

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/ca4fcf127ef6455b052eb9a8b3a946696b91image.png)
 
### Zappl Tag Post Analysis

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/f062cfecc8cf80130e7e598afd711d8956e3image.png)
 
The visualisation above show all postings – both Posts and Comments made in the category/tag for #zappl in March 2018

In March 48K posts were made by 7955 authors receiving 49K comments and 334K votes. The pay-out value of these posts was SBD $15.50K

For comparison in February 49K posts were made by 6889 authors receiving 126K comments and 255K votes. The pay-out value of these posts was SBD $23.65K.

We can see when Zappl stopped voting, there was also a steep decline in posting.

The average post pay out in Feb for #Zappl posts was $3.10 substantially up from the $0.48 in Feb.
These 48K posts received 49K comments from 8,503 authors. The comments received 11K votes and received rewards of SBD $1.10K

### Creators
Below shows which accounts have posted the most to Zappl in the month of March

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/a6f3b5a370912c83fa64daec52ed33f90b89image.png)

 
And the list below shows those that engage with the posts via comments

![image.png](https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/3873022e90e1b101476555dfd36099ce82afimage.png)

 
## Conclusion
The Stats for Zappl this month show major changes.  Delegation has been removed and the vote from Zappl is no longer sizeable. 

This has had a major impact on activity.  Both the number Votes made by @zappl and the number of posts have taken a hit.  Although the first two weeks of March saw almost the same number of posts as all of February.

It is also worth pointing out that the value of the vote for @zappl was taken 10 April.  Delegation was removed during the month and some of the votes were made with the delegation in place.  Therefore the payout values shown are not accurate.

### The SQL Queries

The SQL query used to collect data for votes made by @zappl was:

``` language
 SELECT    *
 FROM Txvotes (NOLOCK)
 WHERE [voter] in ('zappl')
  AND CONVERT(DATE,timestamp) BETWEEN '2018-03-01' AND '2018-03-31'
```

The query used to collect data for posts made to the category/tag Zappl on steemit was:

``` language
 SELECT
 author,
  json_metadata,
 permlink,
 total_payout_value,
  pending_payout_value,
  net_votes,
 created,
children,
Category,
Depth
  FROM comments (NOLOCK)
  where CONVERT(DATE,created) BETWEEN '2018-03-01' AND '2018-03-31'
  and json_metadata like ('%"zappl"%')
```


The Current vote worth for Zappl has been taken from https://steemworld.org/@zappl at 10th April 2018.

**I am part of a Blockchain Business Intelligence community. We all post under the tag #BlockchainBI. If you have an analysis you would like carried out on Steemit or Blockchain data, please do contact me or any of the#BlockchainBI team and we will do our best to help you...**

You can find #BlockchainBI on discord https://discordapp.com/invite/JN7Yv7j


<br /><hr/><em>Posted on <a href="https://utopian.io/utopian-io/@paulag/march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi">Utopian.io -  Rewarding Open Source Contributors</a></em><hr/>
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 16 others
properties (23)
post_id43,059,457
authorpaulag
permlinkmarch-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"staff_pick": null, "platform": "github", "config": {"questions": [{"question": "Were all relevant aspects or metrics around the objective analyzed?", "answers": [{"answer": "All or most of the relevant metrics were covered.", "value": 10, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "Only selected metrics were chosen; including more might have provided additional insights.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Only a single or narrow aspect was chosen.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "No.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "analysis-1"}, {"question": "How would you rate the complexity of extracting the data?", "answers": [{"answer": "Gathering the data required complex queries and post-processing", "value": 10, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "The method of extracting data required transformation.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "No additional data transformation was needed.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "Script generated / one click data extraction.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "analysis-2"}, {"question": "How would you rate the visualization of the findings? ", "answers": [{"answer": "Visualizations were presented beyond expectation - a visualization such as an infographic was given to quickly understand the result of the analysis.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "Appropriate and sufficient visualization were used to understand the results.", "value": 4, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Had visualizations but most were irrelevant to the objective.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Bad.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "analysis-3"}, {"question": "How would you rate the coherency of the analysis?", "answers": [{"answer": "Results of analysis were sorted accordingly and the writing style made the findings easily understandable.", "value": 10, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "There were some connections in-between results, but all throughout the analysis.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Results were presented but the results were not narrated effectively.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "Bad.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "analysis-4"}, {"question": "Is the analysis reproducible?", "answers": [{"answer": "All queries or data gathering methods and all data processing scripts were included.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "The core query or data gathering method was included and the data processing steps were described.", "value": 4, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Data gathering methods and processing steps were sketched.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "No.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "analysis-5"}, {"question": "Is it a new analysis?", "answers": [{"answer": "Yes.", "value": 10, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "It\u2019s similar to a previous contribution, but additional details/aspects were covered.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "It\u2019s following-up or it\u2019s similar to a previous contribution about a different time range or aspect of the project.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "Brings nothing new.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "analysis-6"}, {"question": "Does the writing style meet the Utopian standard considering formalness, informativeness and clarity of the content?", "answers": [{"answer": "It is formal, informative and well written with clear content.", "value": 10, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "It is informative with clear content but not formal enough.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "The contribution could be more informative or contains unrelated information, formality and clarity of the content are good enough.", "value": 4, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "Not all sections were clear enough but overall holds value for the project.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 4}, {"answer": "Not at all.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 5}], "question_id": "c-1"}, {"question": "Was the provided category template for the editor followed?", "answers": [{"answer": "All points of the template were included with additional points as well.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "The template was followed without additions.", "value": 4, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "The template was edited but the points were covered in different way.", "value": 3, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "Not all points of the template were covered in the contribution but the structure is clear enough.", "value": 3, "answer_id": 4}, {"answer": "The template was not followed but the structure is clear enough.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 5}, {"answer": "The contents are not clearly structured at all.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 6}], "question_id": "c-2"}, {"question": "Did the contributor tag other users?", "answers": [{"answer": "No other users were tagged by the contributor.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "Used tags are reasonable and all tagged people are connected to the project and/or the contribution.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "The contribution contains mentions of other users that are not directly related to the contribution but related in other ways.", "value": 2, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "The contributor misuses tagging of other users.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "c-3"}, {"question": "Did the contributor ask for upvotes, resteems, follows or witness vote?", "answers": [{"answer": "No", "value": 5, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "Yes, but not in a way that disturbs readability. ", "value": 5, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Yes.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 3}], "question_id": "c-4"}, {"question": "Was a graphical content like images, charts, videos or screenshots included?", "answers": [{"answer": "Yes, the graphical content is included and adds more value to the contribution.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "No but the contribution works well without graphical content well.", "value": 4, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Yes, but most of the graphical content\u2019s purpose is just for presentational matters.", "value": 3, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "No relevant or useful graphical content is included in the contribution.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 4}], "question_id": "c-5"}, {"question": "How would you rate the overall added value?", "answers": [{"answer": "Extraordinary value to both the project and the open source community overall.", "value": 20, "answer_id": 1}, {"answer": "Significant value to the project or open source community.", "value": 15, "answer_id": 2}, {"answer": "Some value to the project or open source community.", "value": 10, "answer_id": 3}, {"answer": "Little value to the project or open source community.", "value": 5, "answer_id": 4}, {"answer": "No obvious value to project or open source community.", "value": 0, "answer_id": 5}], "question_id": "c-6"}]}, "pullRequests": [], "users": ["Zappl", "paulag", "arcange", "zappl"], "questions": null, "app": "utopian/1.0.0", "score": null, "type": "analysis", "links": ["https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/0e519bf440fc188a22c71a39c86873946315image.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/3b5fcc0320af508cbecb34cfa86830208d28image.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/ca4fcf127ef6455b052eb9a8b3a946696b91image.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/f062cfecc8cf80130e7e598afd711d8956e3image.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/a6f3b5a370912c83fa64daec52ed33f90b89image.png", "https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/3873022e90e1b101476555dfd36099ce82afimage.png"], "moderator": {"time": "2018-04-11T10:57:15.968Z", "pending": false, "reviewed": false, "flagged": true, "account": "crokkon"}, "community": "utopian", "tags": ["utopian-io", "zappl", "steemit", "stats", "blockchainbi"], "total_influence": null, "repository": {"full_name": "Zappl/Zappl", "owner": {"login": "Zappl"}, "id": 110621808, "fork": false, "html_url": "https://github.com/Zappl/Zappl", "name": "Zappl"}, "image": ["https://cdn.utopian.io/posts/0e519bf440fc188a22c71a39c86873946315image.png"], "format": "markdown"}"
created2018-04-11 09:54:27
last_update2018-04-11 10:57:15
depth0
children11
net_rshares2,712,999,505,173
last_payout2018-04-18 09:54:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value8.436 SBD
curator_payout_value2.394 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length5,560
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries
0.
weight1,500
accountutopian.pay
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (80)
@syehlah ·
$1.13
i have long not get a vote from zappl
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id43,059,767
authorsyehlah
permlinkre-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t095658716z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 09:57:03
last_update2018-04-11 09:57:03
depth1
children0
net_rshares248,461,230,519
last_payout2018-04-18 09:57:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.847 SBD
curator_payout_value0.279 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length37
author_reputation17,025,940,490,861
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@bakti ·
Thank you for this accurate information hopefully can increase knowledge and inspiration for stemians especially newcomers in steemit.
properties (22)
post_id43,063,337
authorbakti
permlinkre-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t102851787z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 10:29:03
last_update2018-04-11 10:29:03
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-04-18 10:29:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length134
author_reputation987,289,332,240
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@abh12345 ·
> Zappl was previously in receipt of funding Steemit Inc by way of delegation from Misterdelegation. However this funding has now been revoked.

Seems like this project may be fading away....
properties (22)
post_id43,063,743
authorabh12345
permlinkre-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t103230063z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 10:32:30
last_update2018-04-11 10:32:30
depth1
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-04-18 10:32:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length191
author_reputation590,352,098,179,351
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@paulag ·
Utopian are not even accepting posts on zappl lol....not looking good
properties (22)
post_id43,068,355
authorpaulag
permlinkre-abh12345-re-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t111139761z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 11:11:39
last_update2018-04-11 11:11:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-04-18 11:11:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length69
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@manishmike10 ·
Zappl is a company with institutional share holders. And zappl cannot reward its delegators like utopian does.  Thus assuming this, the delegation may have been revoked due to this issue.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id43,709,330
authormanishmike10
permlinkre-abh12345-re-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180415t134547087z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-15 13:45:48
last_update2018-04-15 13:45:48
depth2
children1
net_rshares3,427,444,186
last_payout2018-04-22 13:45:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length187
author_reputation20,365,209,818,432
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@abh12345 ·
With ROI seemingly of number 1 importance, this does sound to be the most likely reason. Cheers.
properties (22)
post_id43,711,347
authorabh12345
permlinkre-manishmike10-re-abh12345-re-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180415t140009076z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-15 14:00:09
last_update2018-04-15 14:00:09
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-04-22 14:00:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length96
author_reputation590,352,098,179,351
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@crokkon ·
Dear @paulag, we're asked to reject contributions to the `zappl/zappl` repository since beginning of March because there are still doubts whether or not it is full open source. I'm aware that some contributions were accepted in the past, and you basically had close to no chance to know about that decision. I'm deeply sorry about that, and from technical perspective your contribution is excellent as always. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io.
Chat with us on [Discord](https://discord.gg/uTyJkNm).

**[[utopian-moderator]](https://utopian.io/moderators)**
👍  
properties (23)
post_id43,067,916
authorcrokkon
permlinkre-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t110751726z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "utopian/1.0.0", "community": "utopian", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 11:07:54
last_update2018-04-11 11:07:54
depth1
children3
net_rshares2,908,632,388
last_payout2018-04-18 11:07:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length652
author_reputation75,470,595,669,689
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries
0.
weight1,500
accountutopian.pay
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@paulag ·
Okay, quick question, if utopian don't approve the post do they still take a portion of author rewards?
properties (22)
post_id43,068,443
authorpaulag
permlinkre-crokkon-re-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t111214600z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 11:12:15
last_update2018-04-11 11:12:15
depth2
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-04-18 11:12:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length103
author_reputation224,445,607,823,384
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@crokkon · (edited)
Yes, a 15% beneficiary share for @utopian-pay is set for all posts submitted via https://utopian.io at the time the post is created. The list of beneficiaries can only be set once and cannot be changed later on (limitation/feature of Steem). So yes, these 15% from the author rewards still go to utopian even if the post is rejected.

edit: it seems a 15% beneficiary is also set for all comments done via utopian since the last update yesterday
properties (22)
post_id43,068,883
authorcrokkon
permlinkre-paulag-re-crokkon-re-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180411t111553395z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"users": ["utopian-pay"], "links": ["https://utopian.io"], "app": "steemit/0.1", "community": "utopian", "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-11 11:15:57
last_update2018-04-11 11:36:51
depth3
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-04-18 11:15:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length445
author_reputation75,470,595,669,689
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries
0.
weight1,500
accountutopian.pay
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@cw-fr ·
## Your post has been selected by Connect to the World FR
https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/QmYzPJNVRmfzfeMQKLKCtxSVxuw5KLbmKv3snEh2DJGPjg
**@cw-fr**
**We promote English posts in the French community!!**

We are writing a post with our selection that we share within the **French community**
you can see the post by clicking on the image below


**[![](https://steemitimages.com/DQme8mvJkfeXD56PqRCAYf5DwvHR6bGJtLcC5qNuzFhhtUy/image.png)](https://steemit.com/fr/@cw-fr/connect-to-the-world-fr-vous-propose-le-meilleur-du-contenu-anglophone-4)**

Thanks for the great content!!
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id43,251,025
authorcw-fr
permlinkre-paulag-march-18-zappl-steem-app-analysis-blockchainbi-20180412t140203972z
categoryutopian-io
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/fr/@cw-fr/connect-to-the-world-fr-vous-propose-le-meilleur-du-contenu-anglophone-4"], "image": ["https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/QmYzPJNVRmfzfeMQKLKCtxSVxuw5KLbmKv3snEh2DJGPjg"], "users": ["cw-fr"], "tags": ["utopian-io"]}"
created2018-04-12 14:02:06
last_update2018-04-12 14:02:06
depth1
children0
net_rshares987,527,147
last_payout2018-04-19 14:02:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length602
author_reputation235,625,463,700
root_title"March ’18 Zappl STEEM App Analysis – BlockchainBI"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)