<div class="text-justify"> 

Mmmm HF21 , Palnet and other.

I think that is about right. The topics, specifically 50/50 and some curvy shapes that just are not that shapely. But round is a shape too. Yes, but this is a pear shape contest and you are a fucking orange. 

That seems about right. The way I kinda feel everything is mulling around in my head. Not much is on point and that goddamn square block refuses to go into the triangle. 

One thing I can be pretty certain about is whenever I read a post that proposes a change to the system with something along the lines of the people will then do the right thing, or the people will determine the best or "the people" then I have to discount it as bullshit. 

<hr>
<center><img src="https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbiNUwWrZ7BCXrC2MWXh2Ai8GFax7wpD1FJsLauaptomN/child-3046491_1920.jpg"></center>
<hr>

Now a paragraph about content and quality preferably put together to make quality content, then some more words about rewarding content alongside the word creators with an air of snobbism. Maybe I will brag about how great Palnet is and that they are doing moderation? So I read via the grapevine comments. 

There ya go content creators, content curators a place where you get to actively reward quality content... could do it on Steem also. Now I am confused again. Goddamit how am I supposed to judge an orange with a checklist for pears?

<hr>

<h1>Five</h1>

Five paragraphs and I still ain't got shit, I tried. I really tried. I think this is the spot where I assume the fetal position. I do think the fucktards should just leave the current shitward system alone and focus on that thingamajig that will promote better development in the ecosystem. 

Heck Steemit can give all new users some liquid Steem to bot up since they also do not want to get their hands dirty by having an actual curation group. Now that is some distribution right there. 

I wonder what the average content on Steem would be classified as? I would think it is no better than a bastardization of Facebook and Medium but the 2nd generation where it is now considered blue blood.  

It is not to say that we do not try, and here I will do that thing I hate so much in other posts. There is actually exactly one person I can think of which I refuse to agree with wholly purely because they are always so goddamn positive and just a bit twatty in general with how much they just looooove anything steem. 

We try though, at least I think I associate with people who actually try to create something. Say something, share something. Sure I shitward a lot of things but that is purely for their perseverance at consistently producing something. 

Kinda like how you congratulate a thing on their thing when they already have 4 of them. Jesus, can't you stop breeding? there are so many already. I think you need to move to a bigger town this school can't handle all these things. Especially that one with the serial killer look, best you get that fucker out of here.  

<h1>Eleven</h1>

I thought I was done in paragraph 6 which was talking about paragraph 5, and up till then I already had nothing. It is a progression, a few dips there a crescendo HERE! 

I think a 50/50 split can go fuck itself. Not because I completely disagree with it, but because there are better things that can be done now. For one thing and this is a completely ignorant statement, but I do not care for an investor above all else system. Sure they have duped many big spenders to join and make some moola, exactly how you would in the "real world..." 

Yeah, that is it on that. 

As for content, no. Where was I? Blood diamond. No. Unoriginal? No. Content is dead? No, but close. 

Oh well, I can't remember everything. I am damn old. Basically dead. I am like 32 or some shit. Horrible, just horrible. It really needs to end at some point. It will, probably when I am completely happy with living and would actually mind dying. I still mind it but obviously, I don't torture myself in my head so then it is quite nice, actually.  

<h1>I lost count</h1>

It probably does not help to tag that @vandeberg fellow so he can stop this madness with the EIP or whatever it is. Anyway, I guess it is not the engineers' fault that some twat thought "proof of brain" sounded so niche they should build an entire shitward mechanism just on that.  

Then go a step further and use things like community, people, trust, quality... I forget which vid it was but I could not watch much of it since there was far too much hippy bullshit in how they presented steem and the idea. 

Anyway...

I think I am done now. I said some shit... Maybe I used the word shit enough that I can get another !shitcoin, hell I might. I might even use the Palnet tag. 

Haha just fucking with you, I won't use the Palnet tag. But why not?

</div>

<sub>*Edit: <a href="https://steemit.com/steem/@josephsavage/who-deserves-more-authors-or-curators">Hence why I can't exactly discount 50/50</a>, actually found it after posting from this <a href="https://steemit.com/busy/@candy49/which-witnesses-are-in-favour-of-hf21-and-which-are-against">post that has a list</a> and following the link in <a href="https://steemit.com/steem/@therealwolf/do-content-creators-matter">the comment</a></sub>

<br><br><br>
<sub><a href="https://pixabay.com/photos/child-children-fun-baby-3046491/">That fucking guy.</a></sub>