Well said, it's good to adjust and take correction everytime we made a mistake, though in most cases, what do happen that makes it difficult is the way people correcting us (I can called that criticism). 

Not everyone likes to be criticized ,in fact most people don't. But nevertheless ,we have to be relax and take some important point in their criticism ,after all, nobody knows it all.

The Party is a joke, and that's why I left it in 2005.  They are nothing more than a social club of do-nothings and those who meant well but will soon burn out and continue on a different path because the Libertarian Party doesn't care about winning elections.  Michael Badnarik was the last decent candidate the Party had.  After that, it's been a procession of frauds and the clueless gallery of naive newbies who nominated them somehow.

![Frank & Michael Badnarik Immediately After His Victory LP Na.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmTSiuVmwFR3LFkqy2rZBbmHXAg8ysxPMVrDnhsXmHHhnx/Frank%20%26%20Michael%20Badnarik%20Immediately%20After%20His%20Victory%20LP%20Na.jpg)

The libertarian philosophy endures and thrives DESPITE the Libertarian Party, not BECAUSE of it.  As long as idiots continue denying that Ron Paul as a Republican was more libertarian than "Libertarian" Gary Johnson and his fraud sidekick, the LP will continue to underperform into pariah insignificance.

So, what about you--have YOU put YOUR name on a ballot and actually walked the talk, or do you seriously think that only having some silly Party "title" is all you need to make yourself feel like you're doing something productive for liberty?

It seems a difficult exercise for most to look at a situation from a perspective other than their own.  If only we all could take pause in our own ego long enough to weigh options for the most positive, lasting outcome.  A differing opinion isn't necessarily wrong. It may be perfectly correct, due to the experiences they've had leading up to the formation of that opinion. It's only when we take the time to share the experiences behind that opinion that we might come to an understanding and possibly compromise. Our world has taught us to expedite things, but we must fight that conditioning in order to better our relationships. You can only facilitate change by opening up and taking the time to make those connections.

Thank you! You are right. If we really are not about force than it seems that by definition we cannot force our opinions on others. I certainly stand up for my principles but that does not imply that everyone must accept them as law. Kind of what it means to be against aggression or force. Good post.

How was this LP embarrassment resolved, since you say it's not true?

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/28209-has-the-libertarian-party-rejected-ron-paul-and-judge-napolitano