Moving to hive by practicalthought

View this thread on steempeak.com
· @practicalthought · (edited)
$6.77
Moving to hive
Fuck you Justin, we're moving to Hive.

![Fuck Justin Sun](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQVgFgxxxpN1jEZwSYH1tfxjynXikKBcTPwtSfxhTMCVY/fuck.gif)
đź‘Ť  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id72,391,788
authorpracticalthought
permlinkthe-misconception-of-quality-and-reputation
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app":"pruner","message":"See you on the other side!"}"
created2019-04-01 18:31:27
last_update2020-03-24 03:35:48
depth0
children4
net_rshares9,377,274,678,742
last_payout2019-04-08 18:31:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value5.232 SBD
curator_payout_value1.534 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length146
author_reputation33,113,112,148,259
root_title"Moving to hive"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (35)
@tts ·
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
[![](https://s18.postimg.org/51o0kpijd/play200x46.png)](http://ec2-52-72-169-104.compute-1.amazonaws.com/practicalthought__the-misconception-of-quality-and-reputation.mp3)
Brought to you by [@tts](https://steemit.com/tts/@tts/introduction). If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.
properties (22)
post_id72,392,929
authortts
permlinkre-the-misconception-of-quality-and-reputation-20190401t190121
categorysteemit
json_metadata{}
created2019-04-01 19:01:21
last_update2019-04-01 19:01:21
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-04-08 19:01:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length371
author_reputation-4,535,933,372,579
root_title"The Misconception Of Quality And Reputation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@whatsup ·
$0.05
Well, this is a huge surprise and even though I tend to be unemotional by nature, I literally felt a lot of feelings while reading this!  :)

I will skip the emotional acceptance speech and jump to the chase and say:

Thank you very much, this made my day and came at a great time.  I have a huge amount of respect for you, so this meant a lot to me!
đź‘Ť  , ,
properties (23)
post_id72,394,402
authorwhatsup
permlinkre-practicalthought-the-misconception-of-quality-and-reputation-20190401t193655641z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-01 19:37:00
last_update2019-04-01 19:37:00
depth1
children0
net_rshares70,611,109,526
last_payout2019-04-08 19:37:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.038 SBD
curator_payout_value0.012 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length350
author_reputation404,265,487,362,343
root_title"The Misconception Of Quality And Reputation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@glenalbrethsen ·
$0.04
Hey, @practicalthought.

While this does talk about things in a broader context, let me just echo that whatsup and others like her are writers, and that one does not need to be technical, classically trained, etc., to become one.

I also understand where you're coming from regarding the reputation system. I'll even agree the system itself isn't broken, nor is it necessarily the best at judging quality or value, either. Which is probably why it should just go. People like me who care about it and have done what they can to make it meaningful can live without it.

We also need to do away with quality. Not in the way that people have been saying, however. I mean, we don't look at things in terms of quality, really, so we might as well use some other words to describe things. Like, "I like it," or "It's not for me."

Quality isn't in the time spent, or in the words used, or the mastery of grammar, all things that could be and often is used to determine it. Quality is in the connections made, or in the knowledge gained, or in the inspiration given. Whether that happens when we read someone's post often speaks just as much about us as it does the creator.

Instead of using quality as the benchmark, whatever that might mean to everyone here, or saying, down with quality all together, I wouldn't mind us just saying write what you want, and if you get out of it what you want—engagement, upvotes, resteems, friends, etc.—then it's all good.
đź‘Ť  ,
properties (23)
post_id72,399,213
authorglenalbrethsen
permlinkre-practicalthought-the-misconception-of-quality-and-reputation-20190401t215047032z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"users":["practicalthought"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-01 21:50:48
last_update2019-04-01 21:50:48
depth1
children1
net_rshares54,930,614,749
last_payout2019-04-08 21:50:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.030 SBD
curator_payout_value0.009 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,453
author_reputation73,752,675,176,126
root_title"The Misconception Of Quality And Reputation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@practicalthought ·
$0.04
A perfect description. I believe many could do better here if they altered their approach a little and gave some thought to who their audience would be and then made an effort to be for those people what they desire for themselves. And it is possible there is no solid audience yet and the burden would then shift to them on putting in the effort to create such a community here. Not easy and possibly not doable, but if they do make it happen they will be considered the foundation of that corner by those attracted to it.
đź‘Ť  , ,
properties (23)
post_id72,402,844
authorpracticalthought
permlinkre-glenalbrethsen-re-practicalthought-the-misconception-of-quality-and-reputation-20190401t233432785z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-01 23:34:33
last_update2019-04-01 23:34:33
depth2
children0
net_rshares59,010,586,984
last_payout2019-04-08 23:34:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.032 SBD
curator_payout_value0.009 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length523
author_reputation33,113,112,148,259
root_title"The Misconception Of Quality And Reputation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)