<html>
<p><img src="https://images.hive.blog/0x0/https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/agungromadzon/EqBe9pfCdy96LHLxowXhF38YEV5xkthVEXQ6P1DsjFHrNY6M9i9Q44KAAWqH48pc5Kw.jpeg" alt="images - 2021-11-26T134241.900.jpeg"/><br/><a href="https://images.app.goo.gl/ohe4qF1NcfPWEJWV8">Source: The</a><br/>defilements are often compared to dust. It is a polluted mind, and a heart that suffers from its defilements. On the other hand, barley is an enlightened mind that is free from suffering. For this reason, there are some viewpoints that think that only defilements can be achieved. As a result, theories emerged about the need to control the dirty mind and make it clean. It is like logic that the best house can be made by cleaning the house to remove all the dust.</p>
<p>But they refused.</p>
<p>Instead, it directly connects defilements and barley, which seem to be on opposite sides of each other. It is said that defilements and barley are the same thing. Therefore, it is said that there is no barley without defilements.</p>
<p>This is because the human perspective in understanding the mind has matured.</p>
<p>When the human view of a phenomenon is expanded, the phenomenon is also opened to a wider aspect.</p>
<p>The measure of one's view becomes the measure of the existence of the world.</p>
<p>For example, if you look at the Earth from a child's perspective, the Earth looks like a poor child. If man does not protect him, he can do nothing on his own and has a fragile nature that is always sobbing. As a result, there is an argument that humans must 'protect' this poor planet.</p>
<p><img src="https://images.hive.blog/0x0/https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/agungromadzon/23wWRcpKwE3rXoHWLMvQ8SoYvp5zR6DtZX7s11UzWUReMmfEAWCz7rDyNb661Mc8hFKTh.jpeg" alt="images - 2021-11-26T134434.603.jpeg"/><br/><a href="https://images.app.goo.gl/NdbqZd3h1aeT8ipq9">Source:</a><br/>But the reality is different.</p>
<p>It is always the most mature point of view to see the facts as they are, without seeing the delusions that conspiracy theorists bias. This is also the core. When we look at the Earth from a mature point of view, we really know. The fact that we don't have to protect the Earth, but we must sincerely hope that the Earth will protect us.</p>
<p>Earth, which had discovered its true aspect through honest gaze, was not a trait that humans could take care of in the first place. Even the slightest desire from the earth would cause humanity to become extinct. We are not in a position where we have to save the earth, but the earth is saving people.</p>
<p>In this way, the ant, who has acquired the ability to recognize great things, no longer says that he has to save the poor sky. no, I can't say that because I'm ashamed of myself for saying that one time.</p>
<p>Some say shame is a religious phenomenon.</p>
<p>The reason I get a blanket kick after seeing what I've written in the past is because I'm so big now that I can't even compare to what I was doing back then. Before long, the moment when we feel ashamed is actually the moment when the small self becomes the big self.</p>
<p>When one perceives the mind through the eyes of such a large self, the mind is certain to be truly enormous.</p>
<p><img src="https://images.hive.blog/0x0/https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/agungromadzon/23vrn9mLYQexX2wKn91R1vNqXJo8x694fZQurEyh5ingnSLVDqoZaVd9EBmvTGRtHvnrV.jpeg" alt="images - 2021-11-26T134952.136.jpeg"/><br/><a href="https://images.app.goo.gl/5K8jDAxTxkdTf32KA">Source:</a><br/>Really like the universe.</p>
<p>However, we desperately stomped our feet, saying that the tiny dust on the universe size sketch ruined all of this and that we had to save this poor, filthy heart. As if getting rid of that one fine dust is the most important thing in our lives, they insist on bringing justice that we should risk our lives to eliminate corruption.</p>
<p>For this reason, it can be said to be the father of goodness, saying that the mind is basically undefiled, so there is no need to wipe it.</p>
<p>From this point of view, the dust that clings to the sketchbook is not the material that spoils the sketchbook, but the material that announces the inescapable integrity of the sketchbook. Furthermore, the fact that dust can be placed on the sketchbook itself means that dust is already a phenomenon permitted by the sketchbook.</p>
<p>So, why do sketchbooks let in the dust?</p>
<p>Because I want to paint through the dust.</p>
<p>This is because I want to inform the need by drawing.</p>
</html>