I think my account name is so cool and I also care people effort and their quality content. According to me!
And I also think you don't believe me because there are many people who said this to you.
So it depends on you that who deserve your witness votes.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.partiko.android)

I upvote you！👍

@skreza I also think those who support newbies, minnows and make contributions to this community of great people deserve your witness vote.

First of all, thank you for following my account. i am not a witness, i am involved in a curation community for poetry under two accounts - @trumanity, and this one.

I am glad to read your statement about bullying and flags. This is not a good thing to be allowed if it is done unfairly. In normal life, we have courts and procedures to ensure people have rights. I see no reason those norms have to be suspended here. On the issue of vote selling for content and witnesses, I have also see no issue.. if one considers that in real life, we promote, invest, find backing for things which we believe in. If I believe strongly in my own content, i will pay hundreds of my hard earned cash to promote it or to convert one currency into another, while also advancing on the platform. We should not assume that these actions are to promote low quality content or services, no more than we do it in everyday life. In my observations, there are unfair practices going on where powerful circles of account supvote extremely low quality content. There is no open vote buying, but it is there, like an underhanded lobby group or conspriracy. it is very obvious when you look at the content being supported repeatedly by the exact same accounts.

So, I invite everyone to consider more carefully taking sides against vote selling or buying. If a service is paid for and it is inferior, content is paid for and inferior, then we can judge it. The converse should also apply, merely because some so-called respected group, let's say - academy of low quality, expensive movie productions, - hands out gold oscars, this doesn't mean the films are great. those glittery scams exist with red carpets and flashing cameras, but we still know a good film when we see one.. and we still know garbage too. And the garbage producers are still lauded as stars.. but who cares? Not me. ;-)

What I find surprising is those glittery award dishing groups openly stand opposed to buying of votes - they will even refuse to support content where someone went and paid for promotion.. why?  I see buying of votes as an equalising factor here. Otherwise we have to all kowtow to these groups, and produce content which they deem as quality? This is a very shady idea,  it amounts to a form of control. So I am all for vote buying, and curation with good sense.

Sorry for my long comment.

I want some help to you. Can i  .???

I want some help to you. Can i  .???

i believe it is all about community.