RE: Why I'm In Favor Of Witness Vote Decay by smooth

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @blocktrades/re-teamsteem-re-timcliff-re-teamsteem-why-i-m-in-favor-of-witness-vote-decay-20181101t154814574z

· @smooth ·
$0.12
Gradual vote decay would have significant performance impact. The blockchain would need to reconsider the age of every single individual vote to recalculate the totals.

> Don't be too disconcerted, most probably haven't seen the post yet

Why would we see it? Because he bidbotted it up? I think I will decline to respond at all specifically for that reason.

@teamsteem, if you want me to pay attention to your "Trending" posts don't bidbot them. As long as you do don't expect engagement from me but I'll be happy to engage by downvoting them.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id65,320,807
authorsmooth
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-teamsteem-re-timcliff-re-teamsteem-why-i-m-in-favor-of-witness-vote-decay-20181101t184956200z
categorybusy
json_metadata{"users":["teamsteem"],"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-11-01 18:50:00
last_update2018-11-01 18:50:00
depth4
children6
net_rshares107,042,499,013
last_payout2018-11-08 18:50:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.091 SBD
curator_payout_value0.030 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length546
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Why I'm In Favor Of Witness Vote Decay"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@teamsteem ·
I'll ask you to please not downvote my posts specifically. I don't see this as warranted. I haven't asked anyone to answer. People that wanted to answer have answered. Me stating my concerns is a neutral expression of how I feel and in no way a form of denigration of anyone or their actions. Everyone is entitled to their own reflections. I haven't disrespected anyone. 

I think the witness should care about the trending page and should keep tab on it thus why I think they should have seen it.
properties (22)
post_id65,324,342
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-smooth-re-blocktrades-re-teamsteem-re-timcliff-re-teamsteem-why-i-m-in-favor-of-witness-vote-decay-20181101t201930629z
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-11-01 20:19:30
last_update2018-11-01 20:19:30
depth5
children5
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-11-08 20:19:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length497
author_reputation284,009,804,791,421
root_title"Why I'm In Favor Of Witness Vote Decay"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@smooth ·
> I'll ask you to please not downvote my posts specifically

Noted.

> I don't see this as warranted

I disagree. I see them as grossly overrewarded. If you hadn't bidbotted them up to the tune of hundreds of STEEM and they gained their votes organically them maybe they wouldn't be.

> I think the witness should care about the trending page and should keep tab on it

I would be more likely to do so if people including you didn't buy their way onto it. As things stand now the voting system is severely broken and the Trending page is near-meaningless.
properties (22)
post_id65,329,156
authorsmooth
permlinkre-teamsteem-re-smooth-re-blocktrades-re-teamsteem-re-timcliff-re-teamsteem-why-i-m-in-favor-of-witness-vote-decay-20181101t222043000z
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-11-01 22:20:45
last_update2018-11-01 22:20:45
depth6
children4
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-11-08 22:20:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length555
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Why I'm In Favor Of Witness Vote Decay"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@teamsteem ·
> the voting system is severely broken and the Trending page is near-meaningless.

We agree but I still feel witnesses need to keep a tab on it. 

> I disagree. I see them as grossly overrewarded. 

Many time no profit is generated from the bidbot. It's a zero-sum game many times.  

It's also not very intuitive to use them and know how much $ total we bought and how much organic we'll receive. Ironically buying votes will very often discourage people to vote on a post because they feel it's too rewarded or because it didn't generate its views organically. It's a catch 22. 

I used to post once a week working 20-30 hours on a post and even more and would still get flags sometimes even if I wouldn't buy votes as it didn't exist. I wasn't acting the way I was acting for the money back then and I'm still not. If I was back then, I would have split my gigantic post into smaller posts and would have made more money for the exact same amount of work. 

I get your point and I'm not here to attract negative energy between the 2 of us or anyone. I'll obviously try to be more careful. I respect your choice and opinion. It's not about the $ that you're returning to the pool even though it's not negligible. There's more important to me, like how people perceive me and how I feel about myself from the way I act.
properties (22)
post_id65,345,051
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-smooth-re-teamsteem-re-smooth-re-blocktrades-re-teamsteem-re-timcliff-re-teamsteem-why-i-m-in-favor-of-witness-vote-decay-20181102t053428128z
categorybusy
json_metadata{"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-11-02 05:34:27
last_update2018-11-02 05:34:27
depth7
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-11-09 05:34:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,320
author_reputation284,009,804,791,421
root_title"Why I'm In Favor Of Witness Vote Decay"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000