Viewing a response to: @dan/re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t141609995z
Under what you imagine vote negation to be, would they be public in the sense that it could be known who negated the vote of anyone? I'm asking cause I thought this would be the case but when I asked around about if they were in favor of vote negation they said it would be a terrible idea because they imagined who negated a vote couldn't be known and this could be a problem which I think is right.
post_id | 2,460,030 |
---|---|
author | teamsteem |
permlink | re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t172033784z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-23 17:20:33 |
last_update | 2017-04-23 17:20:33 |
depth | 3 |
children | 9 |
net_rshares | 27,644,294,835 |
last_payout | 2017-04-30 17:20:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 401 |
author_reputation | 284,009,804,791,421 |
root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
remlaps | 0 | 12,779,747,205 | 100% | ||
nigelmarkdias | 0 | 14,864,547,630 | 100% |
That reminded me on these four posts which Dan wrote ages ago: [What would Smart Ballots and Kamikaze voters mean to Democracy?](https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/what-would-smart-ballots-and-kamikaze-voters-mean-to-democracy) [Origin of the Right to Vote and how the system denies this right](https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/origin-of-the-right-to-vote-and-how-the-system-denies-this-right) [The Politics of Negative Voting](https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/the-politics-of-negative-voting) [Negative Voting and Steem](https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/negative-voting-and-steem) It is worth rereading them ...
post_id | 2,461,012 |
---|---|
author | ervin-lemark |
permlink | re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t194257395z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/what-would-smart-ballots-and-kamikaze-voters-mean-to-democracy", "https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/origin-of-the-right-to-vote-and-how-the-system-denies-this-right", "https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/the-politics-of-negative-voting", "https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/negative-voting-and-steem"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-23 19:42:57 |
last_update | 2017-04-23 19:42:57 |
depth | 4 |
children | 8 |
net_rshares | 53,296,880,566 |
last_payout | 2017-04-30 19:42:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 636 |
author_reputation | 130,483,487,426,039 |
root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ervin-lemark | 0 | 40,517,133,361 | 100% | ||
remlaps | 0 | 12,779,747,205 | 100% |
I already read them all but I'll re-read them because I feel like I might gain quite a lot from it. I'm not sure I understood everything there was to understand from these posts. I remember being really interested in them but not quite sure I understood all their implication. Thank you very much for your comment @ervin-lemark. I really appreciate it.
post_id | 2,461,679 |
---|---|
author | teamsteem |
permlink | re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t211327798z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["ervin-lemark"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-23 21:13:27 |
last_update | 2017-04-23 21:13:27 |
depth | 5 |
children | 5 |
net_rshares | 52,231,349,924 |
last_payout | 2017-04-30 21:13:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 352 |
author_reputation | 284,009,804,791,421 |
root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ervin-lemark | 0 | 39,707,197,663 | 100% | ||
remlaps | 0 | 12,524,152,261 | 100% |
You are welcome. I share your feelings :) My first impression, eight months ago, was that the ideas are very idealistic. (*what a sentence - ideas are always idealistic :)*) The thing is that the scenario in a way really happened. Canceling out the votes and such ...
post_id | 2,461,705 |
---|---|
author | ervin-lemark |
permlink | re-teamsteem-re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t211714781z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-23 21:17:15 |
last_update | 2017-04-23 21:17:15 |
depth | 6 |
children | 4 |
net_rshares | 51,420,998,951 |
last_payout | 2017-04-30 21:17:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 270 |
author_reputation | 130,483,487,426,039 |
root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ervin-lemark | 0 | 38,896,846,690 | 100% | ||
remlaps | 0 | 12,524,152,261 | 100% |
Thanks for the links. I need to reread those too. I was new when Dan first posted them, so I didn't really catch the significance.
post_id | 2,462,322 |
---|---|
author | remlaps |
permlink | re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t224142118z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-23 22:41:42 |
last_update | 2017-04-23 22:41:42 |
depth | 5 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-04-30 22:41:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 132 |
author_reputation | 284,737,353,688,347 |
root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
You are welcome. Yes, they are significant. The proof being that after eight months I still remember them reading. And I know the content.
post_id | 2,464,283 |
---|---|
author | ervin-lemark |
permlink | re-remlaps-re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170424t053256210z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-24 05:32:54 |
last_update | 2017-04-24 05:32:54 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 52,231,655,144 |
last_payout | 2017-05-01 05:32:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 138 |
author_reputation | 130,483,487,426,039 |
root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ervin-lemark | 0 | 39,707,370,622 | 100% | ||
remlaps | 0 | 12,524,284,522 | 100% |