Multiple medical researchers and directors have indicated that the viral infection rate will likely slow during the summer months.  I fail to understand how that statement is "propaganda" or malicious.  They are correctly addressing the problems of globalised economy that results in over-dependence on one region for resources and manufacturing needs.  Also, the panel addresses potential problems that could result from ludicrous anti-vax conspiracy nonsense that could hinder life-saving medical intervention.  The medical specialist addresses the new form of RNA vaccine that could have some unexpected problems and ethical dilemmas.  He also addresses the necessity of increasing availability of respiratory support machines and increasing the number of respiratory support staff.  Also, the woman correctly points out that continuing vaccine and medical intervention post-epidemic would be necessary to fully control the disease.  

The panelists correctly address the ability of the CCP to be able to institute longer-term monetary policy to alleviate the economic crisis resulting from the quarantine and isolation.  The panel is observing that state control of economic infrastructure does have advantages in crisis situations; even the free 'Murica has provisions for the executive to nationalise critical industries and institutions in times of crisis.  The reason that rational humans live in hierarchal social organisation is for survival during the times of crisis.  The panel correctly addresses that the West has inadequate surveillance and prevention infrastructure to control and contain epidemics, thus the West must increase investment in prevention infrastructure.  

The economist is not laughing at the fact China has and will have negative economic impact from the epidemic.  They are laughing at the comment by the moderator stating the obvious.  The economist was addressing that the question of interest is _how much_ will the Chinese economic contract, not _whether_ it will.  This discussion is not some evil conspiracy that you attempt to portray, but merely informative panel to answer questions.

WTF. What was that evil laugh in unison, when they started talking about the effect the virus would have on the Chinese economy. It seems that they are more amused by the whole thing rather than concerned. Or maybe somewhat impressed with the effect the virus is having. Very telling indeed.  It almsost sounds like they are analysing an experiment, rather than an unexpected virus outbreak. Hmmmm. Am I reading to much into that? I haven't really kept up to date on the whole thing, so maybe you can enlighten me somewhat!https://youtu.be/y4NSbtKDuXQ?t=1873.

keeping in mind that the Pharmaceutical Corporations ONLY make money when you are ill, what can you figure from a Virus that mutates faster than the CDC (who is also the largest holder of medicinal patents in the world) can identify and the early vaccines do more harm than good.  Where is this pointing?  More money for unproven, ineffective inoculations?  Maybe?
Eat Healthy, Wash with PLAIN soap, not the "Anti Bacterial" kind (a virus is NOT bacterial in nature) and use as hot water as you can stand.  
BE HEALTHY and you more than likely won't catch COVID-19..

CFR probably created COVID or know who did.