I have not told you what you said.

I quoted you.  I simply reposted the exact words you wrote.

Tell me how I got that wrong?

Again, you have failed to answer any of my questions.

You have explained repeatedly other things about your plan, in lieu of addressing my concerns.  I have not explored those other matters because I don't feel they merit consideration until the concerns I have posed can be answered.

I have stated that what you said had implications in terms of valuation of currency - which you may be thinking of when you say I told you what you said.  

Try reading what I wrote, where I quoted you directly, two comments ago. 

While it is perhaps not your common practice, what have you got to lose?  You have mentioned that you gave up posting about your idea because you weren't happy with the results.  Maybe the points I have been trying to get across to you can enable you to gain some traction in your posts, if you consider them, and modify your concept accordingly.

As for my plan to get rid of debt, the banksters, et al.. I have never proposed a plan, exactly, merely general principles such as simply making the extant bankster system obsolete by conducting commerce in other ways, so that the fractional reserve fraud system become irrelevant.

Cryptos are a way to do that, as long as they aren't captured by banksters, which at this point in time isn't assured.  Maybe truly decentralized cryptos can be rendered Sybil attack proof, but there are no truly decentralized cryptos yet.

Lastly, just because I don't have a plan to go to the moon doesn't mean that I can't state correctly that firing clowns out of a cannon towards the moon will not work.  I haven't said that employing extant coinage to attack the fraudulent banksters can't work.  I have said that your proposal doesn't account for how increasing the valuation of extant coinage will decrease the value of paper fiat.  I have also said that it will decrease the value of paper fiat, which I have quoted you also saying, as well as quoted you saying the exact opposite.

This contradiction by you indicates you can benefit from considering how value is imparted to currency further, and thus improve your plan to pay the national debt, and reform currency.

That is my only goal, and if you are annoyed by it, that isn't my fault.