But is not able to explain more and more complex games as an example of more complex games Let's say Wittgenstein is leading two words to this language consisting of names and colors to and fro and now the Builder is shouting red brick from there that word is not formalized there by means and theories proposed the author of the treatise is a very small stroke. The big difference and how it turns out that the meaning of a word depends on its use of this practice which around it is formed correctly understands My words are also figurative groups in different languages games of different cycles of practice can significantly different things we can not say that any of these definitions of the person to some false it may not be consistent only with the rules then the language win another philosophical example We arrived on the island and observe the natives for the first time chasing for a rabbit screaming hunger we admit that in the court language this word means a rabbit but maybe it means a rabbit tail or a sacred Grail and so on so the interpretation of foreign language games is very You can even solve an unsolvable problem I would also like to say This is what things are the language of the main subject of research philosophy According to the late paradigms is such a lively formation It consists of different contexts Some of them are central Some of them just without them we can not language at all well some categories are admissible deduced by Aristotle and Lecant