RE: Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin. by coldbolt

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @swinn/re-coldbolt-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t214240246z

· @coldbolt ·
$0.03
From what I can see, you're able to cut through the bullshit when it comes to "Youtube Blockchain Tipsters" and there is no doubt that someone who is able to deconstruct these posts isof heavy valuable to Steem. That's going to give you a lot of authority on this Blockchain and from there, you could even refer people to your content to extend on your reasoning. 

I personally believe a lot of the problem is the curation. I can understand that a lot of Steem users, feel their vote isn't worth much whenever a "whale" can change the tide for reasons outside of the quality of said content. I would rather do this via by reputation. The investment would still go through depending on Voting Power and Steem Power, but now it's not a game of who has the most money but rather, how dependable is this person's vote to said content. You would have to believe that a person who is looking for the best content, is not going to be as easily swayed as their reputation could be tarnished because of "voting fraud". With the current model, this just doesn't happen. 

Personally a system needs to be made where a vote can be trusted as a means of quality curation. I can fully grasp that if a person invests money into something, it's a show of how much confidence they have in said content but as said, it simply just doesn't work. That's why I'd like reputation to be used. That way, if you keep ripping people's content but being right about it, you'll be seen as someone bettering the blockchain and your vote would mean more because of it. 

How much you invest to said content to keep content creators coming back, that's up to you and I hope this happens soon. Would make for far better content.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id37,125,642
authorcoldbolt
permlinkre-swinn-re-coldbolt-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t220849597z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-06 22:08:48
last_update2018-03-06 22:08:48
depth5
children1
net_rshares7,894,952,246
last_payout2018-03-13 22:08:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 SBD
curator_payout_value0.002 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,697
author_reputation176,920,345,078
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@gjones15 · (edited)
I agree.  It does kinda suck that rep has zero necessary connexion to income.  I also can't help but just see the stark obviousness of @swinn's opinion that this hijean person just "figured 'it' out--" in a way, it *motivates me* to do better.  Personally, yes, of course I would like to make a bit more coin--but hey, frankly I'm just grateful I've made *anything*.  And though I might not be the strongest steemain atm, I have confidence that I *will* grow stronger.  That being said, it kind of saddens me to hear someone like you, @swinn, be so quickly discouraged... Heajin is only one person!!  If he's truly "so bad," then, someone *better*--and that's the thing--there *is* always someone better--then they will show up and prevail.  Then life will go on lol.  *If* you are a capitalist--in other words, a "free market" economist--then by design, you must adhere to the belief that *currency* (money) is a *accurate representation of desire;* the last word being key here.  In other words, the belief that basically the "demand" for a product is one and the same as an agent's *willingness to pay* for it.  If *that* is the case, then, we must agree that, although *we* might not like *x,y,z* that, if people *are* freely *giving them money* that we must--assuming we respect their personal right to spend as they wish and they are doing so "without coercion"--agree the recipient of that "willingness to pay" is *necessarily* providing *some* kind of value.  

So what's the answer?  Simple:  CREATE SOMETHING THAT IS MORE DESIRABLE.  

When I figure out what that is, I'll (possibly) let you know ;)

So @swinn, I challenge you to *stay*--the platform is young--the "quality" *will* improve--but not if all the quality people run off before that can happen!!
properties (22)
post_id37,913,947
authorgjones15
permlinkre-coldbolt-re-swinn-re-coldbolt-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180311t033050685z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["swinn"], "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-11 03:30:51
last_update2018-03-11 03:33:48
depth6
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-03-18 03:30:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,768
author_reputation1,227,125,239,851
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000