RE: Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin. by dahlsom

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @mysted/re-dahlsom-201838t174524365z

· @dahlsom ·
Just because simple minds are deceived by complex and complicated topic matter, doesn't mean it's unethical to teach.  He does an excellent job of explain how TA is to be used, and that it should not be blindly followed.  He also provides some material to help people get educated on Eliot Wave counting. 

If you have a formal proof of why it doesn't work in certain situations perhaps you should post them to help out the community.  But by down voting to "protect us" from his educational lectures is non sense as one of the principles of the platform is uncensored.  If we want to watch content that you or anyone else approves of we can go to another site.

He is one of the most responsible analysts I've ever encountered.  He goes out of his way to explain how his analysis should be applied in conjunction with ones own analysis.  He choices his words very carefully and is very precise in what he says.

Thanks for defending us little guys, but no thanks... I'll decide which analyst I want to follow and listen to.  Please piss off and stop flagging the content providers I follow.   I'm sure there are plenty of TA or analysts that you follow that do piss poor jobs, but I'm not out flagging them.
properties (22)
post_id37,536,747
authordahlsom
permlinkre-mysted-re-dahlsom-201838t174524365z-20180308t214823750z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-08 21:48:24
last_update2018-03-08 21:48:24
depth6
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-03-15 21:48:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,208
author_reputation160,119,580,804
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000