RE: Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin. by fechaugger

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @thatanimesnob/re-btc-dialog-re-thatanimesnob-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t182123258z

· @fechaugger ·
And the value of the content itself is very short-live. 
In a few months, nobody will be reading content that he wrote this week.
properties (22)
post_id37,223,968
authorfechaugger
permlinkre-thatanimesnob-re-btc-dialog-re-thatanimesnob-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180307t100424104z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-07 10:04:24
last_update2018-03-07 10:04:24
depth5
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-03-14 10:04:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length129
author_reputation442,135,671,869
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@thatanimesnob ·
That too. They have as much value as all those who do predictions and pre-airing hype for an upcoming episode or movie based on some unbased rumors they heard.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id37,226,253
authorthatanimesnob
permlinkre-fechaugger-re-thatanimesnob-re-btc-dialog-re-thatanimesnob-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180307t101900842z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-07 10:19:15
last_update2018-03-07 10:19:15
depth6
children0
net_rshares1,070,229,362
last_payout2018-03-14 10:19:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length159
author_reputation426,579,518,801
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@dahlsom ·
The platform should reward content providers with residual income if they want posts that provide long term benefits.  The problem isn't the content providers but rather the model being implemented. If you reward short term content you get short term content.
properties (22)
post_id37,485,097
authordahlsom
permlinkre-fechaugger-re-thatanimesnob-re-btc-dialog-re-thatanimesnob-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180308t154050516z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-08 15:40:51
last_update2018-03-08 15:40:51
depth6
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-03-15 15:40:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length259
author_reputation160,119,580,804
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000