RE: Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin. by ideafarm

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @knircky/re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t155903643z

· @ideafarm · (edited)
$0.05
I am very new to Steemit.  But what @knircky says here rings true to me.  The response to allegedly manipulative content should be to expose it, not censor it.  @transisto's open letter admits that he/she flags posts that he/she disagrees with or disapproves of.  That violates the etiquette guidelines that I just read yesterday, doesn't it?

My own views are quite politically incorrect.  If I am going to be flagged by people just for sincerely speaking my mind, just because they want to silence my point of view, and if the Steemit community is ok with that kind of censorship and mob thinking, then maybe I'll have to keep looking for a place where diversity of thought is really valued and, not just tolerated, but cherished.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id37,075,084
authorideafarm
permlinkre-knircky-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t164015541z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["knircky", "transisto"], "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-06 16:40:36
last_update2018-03-06 16:42:00
depth2
children0
net_rshares12,249,848,031
last_payout2018-03-13 16:40:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.046 SBD
curator_payout_value0.002 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length732
author_reputation156,474,814,165
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)