RE: Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin. by kamalisti

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @transisto/open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin

· @kamalisti ·
@ranchorelaxo is entirely entitled to up vote each and every one of your posts. As I disagree with their vote, I will continue to flag each one that is so voted upon.

The value of content should be the basis of valuing how much is the reward, because in the end the STEEMIT token will only loses its value if the content is not valuable. You are attempting to make it look as if you have engaged in a dialog; you have not. You simply wish to continue flying under the radar with your collusive voting ring which is earning.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
post_id37,032,240
authorkamalisti
permlinkre-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t122341603z
categoryabuse
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["ranchorelaxo"], "tags": ["abuse"]}"
created2018-03-06 12:23:42
last_update2018-03-06 12:23:42
depth1
children0
net_rshares601,525,563
last_payout2018-03-13 12:23:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length524
author_reputation-1,405,328,253,928
root_title"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)