RE: Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin. by swinn

Viewing a response to: @whatsup/re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t200715647z

abuse · @swinn · Mar 6 '18

$0.04

I respect that and thank you for commenting.

👍 mysted, whatsup

`post_id`	37,107,473
`author`	swinn
`permlink`	re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t201402979z
`category`	abuse
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
`created`	2018-03-06 20:14:06
`last_update`	2018-03-06 20:14:06
`depth`	4
`children`	6
`net_rshares`	12,278,038,256
`last_payout`	2018-03-13 20:14:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.040 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.004 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	44
`author_reputation`	108,531,437,568
`root_title`	"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
whatsup	0 B		4,584,845,688	1%
mysted	0 B		7,693,192,568	100%

@whatsup · Mar 6 '18

$0.03

I hope there will be a "blogger" and Author community once we have the ability to support that.

On a personal note, as an investment, I am glad we have a broader reach.

Once we have communities it will be easier for people to see and reward the content they want to see.  Authors should be able to find price support for their work.  We will see.

👍 drpuffnstuff, swinn

`post_id`	37,111,440
`author`	whatsup
`permlink`	re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t203922933z
`category`	abuse
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
`created`	2018-03-06 20:39:24
`last_update`	2018-03-06 20:39:24
`depth`	5
`children`	5
`net_rshares`	8,101,324,874
`last_payout`	2018-03-13 20:39:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.028 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.002 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	348
`author_reputation`	404,265,487,362,343
`root_title`	"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
drpuffnstuff	0 B		5,952,162,855	4%
swinn	0 B		2,149,162,019	100%

@swinn · Mar 6 '18

$0.18

Thanks again. I hope so too. 

Regardless, the bots and power mechanisms here are noxious. They throw acid on quality authors striving to succeed, and in the most direct way possible. As long as they exist and power tilts in their favor, little is going to change. Example: Google goes great lengths to eliminate SEO spam and other abuses for ranking. My Google rankings have shot up over the years sheer through the elimination of spammers that used to outrank me. Here, it is the complete opposite and they are openly promoted for use.

Authors have it rough, and they are at the bottom level of the publishing food chain, money-wise. It is just very strange to see a platform that was created to rectify this issue become its biggest advocate. Thanks again and not to sound harsh - I LOVE the open discourse but I'm just calling it as I see it.

👍 whatsup, mysted, drpuffnstuff, futuretomorrow, vando

`post_id`	37,113,759
`author`	swinn
`permlink`	re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t205343445z
`category`	abuse
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
`created`	2018-03-06 20:53:45
`last_update`	2018-03-06 20:53:45
`depth`	6
`children`	4
`net_rshares`	46,713,882,814
`last_payout`	2018-03-13 20:53:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.164 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.017 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	847
`author_reputation`	108,531,437,568
`root_title`	"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (5)

voter	rshares	pct
whatsup	32,093,919,822	8%
drpuffnstuff	5,952,162,855	4%
mysted	7,527,152,441	100%
futuretomorrow	589,075,147	100%
vando	551,572,549	100%

@whatsup · Mar 6 '18

$0.03

Understood and I don't disagree with anything you've said.  
Right now I just see it as supply and demand.  There are more people willing to write (not saying they are all equal) than there are people willing to pay for content under the current business model.

👍 drpuffnstuff, swinn

`post_id`	37,116,052
`author`	whatsup
`permlink`	re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t210836206z
`category`	abuse
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
`created`	2018-03-06 21:08:36
`last_update`	2018-03-06 21:08:36
`depth`	7
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	7,983,884,327
`last_payout`	2018-03-13 21:08:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.026 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.002 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	261
`author_reputation`	404,265,487,362,343
`root_title`	"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
drpuffnstuff	0 B		5,952,162,855	4%
swinn	0 B		2,031,721,472	100%

@mysted · Mar 6 '18

You're totally, right. I hope the platform will change for the better. To bad to see people like you leaving the platform.

👍 swinn

`post_id`	37,116,486
`author`	mysted
`permlink`	re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180306t211118335z
`category`	abuse
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["abuse"]}"
`created`	2018-03-06 21:11:18
`last_update`	2018-03-06 21:11:18
`depth`	7
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	1,961,257,143
`last_payout`	2018-03-13 21:11:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	122
`author_reputation`	2,789,687,494,229
`root_title`	"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
swinn	0 B		1,961,257,143	100%

@liotap · Mar 7 '18

@swinn You are correct about steemit. we will see this year group of people building applications with specific focuses. One may be TA, another fine Art. From there, depending on what you are interested in, you will have the ability to use different apps for curated feeds. All that powered by Steem. It is hard to predict the impact of steemit bots as it pertains to other applications.
perhaps reach out to @andrarchy on this matter. 

And... please do not leave, the community will be stronger as more people like you join!

👍 swinn, kirbyhopper

`post_id`	37,141,561
`author`	liotap
`permlink`	re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-whatsup-re-swinn-re-mysted-re-transisto-open-letter-to-ranchorelaxo-and-haejin-20180307t002947145z
`category`	abuse
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["swinn", "andrarchy"], "tags": ["abuse"]}"
`created`	2018-03-07 00:19:18
`last_update`	2018-03-07 00:19:18
`depth`	7
`children`	1
`net_rshares`	1,855,560,650
`last_payout`	2018-03-14 00:19:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	526
`author_reputation`	1,815,051,235,596
`root_title`	"Open letter to @Ranchorelaxo and @Haejin."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
kirbyhopper	0 B		0	100%
swinn	0 B		1,855,560,650	100%

1 reply