> Well. "poor haejin" I think he's making enough now not to be called poor anymore. =)

lmao ahahahahaah true.

Hmmmmmmmm regarding your suggestion - idk man. I doubt he'd be ready to reduce the number of posts. I know if I was in his place, I wouldn't.

If we consider this assumption (which is almost like a fact, I think i did read it somewhere else), that haejin used to post 10 posts a day since day 1, whem he used to earn 0.01 per post, then it's not really fair to tell him to stop posting with the same frequency. See, if people didn't bother when he was earning 0.01, then let them fuck off when he's earning handsomely. Fuck me, I'd go on to say he **deserves** to earn $300+ per post now; it's because of his own hard work (unless he bought steem, well, still it's his own money invested?) 

With that last logic though, even bernie's actions get justified. But bernie is the negativer one among the two. At least haejin used to rape the reward pool without sounding like a girl that's being punished in some brothel lmao.

Anyway man, it's all @ned's fault; he fucked up. He could set some restrictions and other responsible shit, but no! Gotta maintain dat sweet ass hair yo

Ahh my bad man, I had only addressed your final comment of haejin losing his cool. 
I see your point now. Seems like I jumped the gun there hehe; sorry about that. 
Lost control over my feelings there, looks like all this drama made me lose my cool too lol

>All I got as a reply was name-calling and you defending the name-calling.

Yeah I realize that was wrong, now. Sorry again, man.

God, I'm literally all over the place here, been diluting my attention so I'm able to reply to everyone's claims and whatnot.

Won't happen again, @inertia. 

Hope we're cool now?
<sub><sub>sorry again</sub>

If it's not censorship what is it?  Dictating the content and manner in which the content a content provider provides... kind of sounds like censorship.