It's not a question of not wanting to wait, it's more like, can we afford to wait.  The noose gets tighter everyday.

>"before trying to vote an anarchist into office? Do I need to explain the math here?">

No, but I'm finding it hard to object to Adam using the same club that the state has been beating us over the head with for a 100+ years, to beat them out of existence.  It's poetic justice in a way.

>"And no, you not liking something doesn't automatically make it a "hit piece.">

 Yes, agreed but now I have to explain myself further by breaking it down - next post

No everything is not equally likely.  Believe me, I can make the case that Adam becoming President is impossible too. Not as well as you but I can take it much further than you have so far.  And I'm not angry, not at all.  I know I come off like that but it's truly meant only to be the logical facts - the way I see them.

And your saying that Adam doesn't have a chance is not the problem.  I have no objection, it's not like the statement is without logic and it's not like you, my friend, don't have the right to say whatever you think is right.

>"It's clear that you WANT to believe that Adam's agenda has a chance. But it doesn't. At all. And for him to lead people like YOU on, making them think that is the answer, is counter-productive.">

Of course, I do want to believe there's a chance to get our freedom back for the sake of our children.  That's everything for me.  What are we going to leave them with.  I shudder to think. I'm old. I remember when there was less government.  That was a good thing. The things I did back then without any fear of tyranny.. gov grew, things got worse.

I can't logically accept your premise that you for certain know a future outcome even if it is the most likely today. What could happen tomorrow to alter it?  We don't know and the possibilities are not subject to our imaginations.

Adam is certainly not leading ME on, I have no illusions.  I never had the impression he was trying to con anyone into believing the impossible.  It's a struggle and if nothing else, his campaign is going to open a lot of eyes.  People who believe they own themselves have done some critical thinking and are not such easily led sheep.  I don't know if that's true for sure but it makes sense.

You know if Adam was really just looking to become potus, he would not have chosen a plan which you say has no chance. I think he'd have taken a different, a less honest route like they all do.

I have seen no evidence or signs of what you're accusing him of.  If I did, I'd say it. 

I just keep thinking of how much help you with your knowledge could be in facilitating the elimination of the FED gov... that's a start isn't it.  I wish we could all pull in the same direction.

oh, just took a look at that last paragraph again... it's a really "sour" perspective that I've seen no evidence for.  I don't know what else to think but it sounds personal.  Is it?

fyi - I've never disagreed with one thing I've ever heard you say till now.  I'm always uplifted when I hear the truth.

Thank you, Larken Rose for all the truth you've told and all those eyes you've opened, mine included.