RE: Science plagiarism: Oendertuerk by xyzashu

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @mathowl/puqgnc

· @xyzashu ·
Hmm, nice catch by @johnwatson! 

I wonder how come this author was whitelisted by @ocdb when @acidyo knows about him!

Anyway, thanks for revealing the truth. I had set this author on my auto-voter. Time to re-configure that.
properties (22)
post_id78,002,847
authorxyzashu
permlinkre-mathowl-puqjph
categoryantiabuse
json_metadata{"tags":["antiabuse"],"app":"steempeak\/1.14.6"}
created2019-07-16 12:51:21
last_update2019-07-16 12:51:21
depth3
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-07-23 12:51:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length226
author_reputation425,489,540,776,807
root_title"Science plagiarism: Oendertuerk"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@enforcer48 ·
Some people take advantage of other's mercy.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id78,004,741
authorenforcer48
permlinkre-xyzashu-puqmcu
categoryantiabuse
json_metadata{"tags":["antiabuse"],"app":"steempeak\/1.14.6"}
created2019-07-16 13:48:30
last_update2019-07-16 13:48:30
depth4
children0
net_rshares2,996,269,102
last_payout2019-07-23 13:48:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length44
author_reputation72,258,491,181,307
root_title"Science plagiarism: Oendertuerk"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@johnwatson ·
$0.03
Can't help but wonder WHY you had @oendertuerk on your auto-votes to begin with.

Did you actually enjoy his spun articles? Did you think he deserved your support for his hard work and original thought?

Or, did you just notice he's going all-in on the bid-bots and you figured his abuse of the platform economics would bring you good curation returns?!

Think about it for a minute. Giving upvotes to meaningless content just because the curation-returns will be good is eventually doing just as much harm to the platform as posting meaningless content just to farm tokens.

But you already know that, you're quite good at the game yourself.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id78,030,419
authorjohnwatson
permlinkpurxe9
categoryantiabuse
json_metadata{"tags":["antiabuse"],"users":["oendertuerk"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-07-17 06:44:33
last_update2019-07-17 06:44:33
depth4
children0
net_rshares83,430,399,873
last_payout2019-07-24 06:44:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 SBD
curator_payout_value0.007 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length642
author_reputation754,705,956,696
root_title"Science plagiarism: Oendertuerk"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)