"The difference between a tribal government or nation is that they are not claiming a monopoly on all of the earth and everyone born on the land as the State does."... I can't think of an example of an indigenous nation that doesn't claim territory and I can't think of a State that claims all of the Earth. That's a distinction without a difference.

Ok, let me rephrase to be more clear: Tribes don't claim a monopoly on land, at least in the past we didnt. some tribes were stationary but many were nomadic. It was a totally different concept of land and property, you know this. The State's around the world all collectively claim ownership of the Earth.

also, " Who and where? I can't think of one anarchist philosopher, individualist or otherwise, who isn't American or European."

I don't know that everyone ever espousing their individuality or a philosophy of self governance has been catalogued or even wrote their ideas on paper. To assume that only Americans and Europeans are capable of individuality or understanding individualist anarchist philosophy is silly. 

Again man, I feel like no matter what platform you engage me on you are antagonistic or looking for an argument.