RE: BitShares Hangout #28 - 2017-07-07 - OpenSource Agenda [WhaleShare and BeyondBit Payments Based on Post Payouts!] by ash

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @officialfuzzy/bitshares-hangout-28-2017-07-06-opensource-agenda-whaleshare-and-beyondbit-payments-based-on-post-payouts

· @ash · (edited)
$6.67
please ask witnesses in call (I won't make it)

* how are you avoiding dangerous feed errors in case of bitcoin fork?
* are there plans to hold bitBTC prior to 1st of august?
👍  , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id6,353,676
authorash
permlinkre-officialfuzzy-bitshares-hangout-28-2017-07-06-opensource-agenda-whaleshare-and-beyondbit-payments-based-on-post-payouts-20170706t163239554z
categorybeyondbitcoin
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["beyondbitcoin"]}"
created2017-07-06 16:32:42
last_update2017-07-06 16:34:45
depth1
children3
net_rshares1,387,403,802,598
last_payout2017-07-13 16:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value6.059 SBD
curator_payout_value0.609 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length174
author_reputation217,103,420,888,695
root_title"BitShares Hangout #28 - 2017-07-07 - OpenSource Agenda [WhaleShare and BeyondBit Payments Based on Post Payouts!]"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (11)
@cm-steem · (edited)
$1.62
Relevant BSIP in case of bitBTC global settlement:
* "[BSIP-0018 : Revive BitAsset through buying Settlement Pool](https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0018.md)"
* "[BSIP-0017 : Revive BitAssets after global settlement](https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0017.md)"

A good question is: What fork will bitBTC reference after the split? 

Preferably, we shouldn't reference the 'UASF' fork.
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id6,355,920
authorcm-steem
permlinkre-ash-re-officialfuzzy-bitshares-hangout-28-2017-07-06-opensource-agenda-whaleshare-and-beyondbit-payments-based-on-post-payouts-20170706t165813157z
categorybeyondbitcoin
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0018.md", "https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0017.md"], "tags": ["beyondbitcoin"]}"
created2017-07-06 16:58:15
last_update2017-07-06 19:19:36
depth2
children2
net_rshares338,698,926,411
last_payout2017-07-13 16:58:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.239 SBD
curator_payout_value0.384 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length420
author_reputation58,583,832,278,845
root_title"BitShares Hangout #28 - 2017-07-07 - OpenSource Agenda [WhaleShare and BeyondBit Payments Based on Post Payouts!]"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@ash · (edited)
> A good question is: What fork will bitBTC reference after the split?

I'd prefer UASF though. But it doesn't matter that much, since bitBTC is just a minor side product in our company... we just need to avoid negative news, eventually affecting all smartcoins, because we did not react in time
properties (22)
post_id6,414,752
authorash
permlinkre-cm-steem-re-ash-re-officialfuzzy-bitshares-hangout-28-2017-07-06-opensource-agenda-whaleshare-and-beyondbit-payments-based-on-post-payouts-20170707t060926499z
categorybeyondbitcoin
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["beyondbitcoin"]}"
created2017-07-07 06:09:27
last_update2017-07-07 06:09:42
depth3
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-14 06:09:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length295
author_reputation217,103,420,888,695
root_title"BitShares Hangout #28 - 2017-07-07 - OpenSource Agenda [WhaleShare and BeyondBit Payments Based on Post Payouts!]"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@cm-steem · (edited)
I prefer the big-block approach as originally intended by Satoshi; off-chain solutions are a neat idea on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, but strangling the core scaling mechanism (increasing block size) to push everyone onto blockstream's off-chain scaling solution is a terrible idea.

UASF by definition is a sybill attack, they're even proposing changing POW mechanisms which is really a scorched earth policy for BTC!

On the upside, we may experience the 'flippening' where BTC loses its #1 place, if this happens who knows what will happen in the crypto markets?! Exciting times!
properties (22)
post_id6,439,659
authorcm-steem
permlinkre-ash-re-cm-steem-re-ash-re-officialfuzzy-bitshares-hangout-28-2017-07-06-opensource-agenda-whaleshare-and-beyondbit-payments-based-on-post-payouts-20170707t122322334z
categorybeyondbitcoin
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["beyondbitcoin"]}"
created2017-07-07 12:23:24
last_update2017-07-07 12:24:06
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-14 12:23:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length585
author_reputation58,583,832,278,845
root_title"BitShares Hangout #28 - 2017-07-07 - OpenSource Agenda [WhaleShare and BeyondBit Payments Based on Post Payouts!]"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000