Where the fuck did you pull that from? You are so victimized by me telling you about moderation and how you ought to not be so befuddled where before I mentioned that Steem ain't about investors and that was after I attempted to bring you to talk about the reward pool,  which you obviously had no interest in discussing while serendipity you want to hint yet again that basing my judgement of your utter lack on moral constitution by the numerous implications or outright telling lack of concern "it's your stake you can do whatever you want with it" and proud support of abusive behavior, is simply "to hold a different view from me", while you can ignore the substance of what I said and instead focus on the hairs I've raised as I spoke in sarcasm of certain behaviors, which on their own accord make the judgement about you,  not simply because I say so or simply because it's a different opinion. 

The point was that the reward pool isn't a product to be sold,  that the experiment you think is happening ain't got shit for it to be an experiment, that the point ain't for crypto or tech,  or any other vacuous nonsense but all about curation, content and rewards, (things you outright dismissed) and that even with the proposed changes, moderation is coming, you can have your multilevel marketing scam, I'm taking content and Curation and the aspect of rewarding both, and you can mumble on "it's your stake do whatever you want with it" amidst the voturbation that remains, because investors come for content and FUNCTION-AL Premise while speculators come for the CRYPTO, and in my opinion the more we distance from them the better, but you,  you can be speechless because you think I form my judgement on your moral deficiency on simply  difference of opinion, good one,  it's as if you gave a fuck about discussing shit.