Viewing a response to: @dan/why-every-blockchain-needs-a-constitution
>### Get Signed Acceptance > >Every user should cryptographically sign the constitution. This gives the dispute resolution terms standing in a court of law and demonstrates the extent to which the community has consented to a common set of values. Failure to agree on values should be a red-flag. While this *could* work for Steem, maybe, to say every user (account, address, whatever) on every blockchain should sign its constitution isn't really feasible.
post_id | 35,258 |
---|---|
author | pfunk |
permlink | re-dan-why-every-blockchain-needs-a-constitution-20160701t090350518z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["blockchain"]}" |
created | 2016-07-01 09:04:09 |
last_update | 2016-07-01 09:04:09 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-24 04:43:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 458 |
author_reputation | 208,395,764,935,287 |
root_title | "Why every Blockchain needs a Constitution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |