RE: Challenge my current Hypothesis: Banning things does not achieve the stated goal... by dwinblood

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @dksart/re-dwinblood-challenge-my-current-hypothesis-banning-things-does-not-achieve-the-stated-goal-20171128t032924401z

· @dwinblood ·
>It is not about banning or not banning something, it is about eliminating/creating laws/policies that benefit the most people.

Semantics.   Smokescreen.   If you need to take it as proving it actually benefitted people as was stated as the goal.  I cannot find a case where that is actually true.   At least not yet.    Ban substances, tools, literature, etc.
properties (22)
post_id18,892,230
authordwinblood
permlinkre-dksart-re-dwinblood-challenge-my-current-hypothesis-banning-things-does-not-achieve-the-stated-goal-20171128t033615669z
categorychallenge
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["challenge"]}"
created2017-11-28 03:36:15
last_update2017-11-28 03:36:15
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-12-05 03:36:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length361
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"Challenge my current Hypothesis: Banning things does not achieve the stated goal..."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000