I like warm fuzzies too. #willpayinwarmfuzzies

We reward with an upvote multiplier now instead of bonus shares and warm fuzzies.  Well... you might still get the warm fuzzies.

You are welcome to edit your submission and I will review again (or you can resubmit if your edit is substantial.)

Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate this response 6. Covers all the important points without getting too technical and confusing new or potential members.

I am going to give it a 5 as it is a simple answer to the questions that is correct but leaves out some details of what really goes on.

I rate this as 5. The manner of description looks wack for a FAQ and not detailed enough.

5 clarity point

Good explanation for layman. Nice answer but can use more details.

Rating 6, good answer

Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate a 4. Accurate, but confusing to potential or new members that may never have heard of rshares.  Not enough detail.

I will give it a 4 as it answers the question but would lead to another question.

I rate this as 3. It doesn't explains the multiplier and would only give room to another question(s).

3 clarity point

What is rshares? Why should I increase it? Increased by how much?

~~Rating 6, I'm missing the multiplication factor~~
Rating 7, i like the links for further information

This is actually our old system. The Vote Values Part Three has a summary of the new system, although we later boosted the multiplier from 1.25 to 1.34x, where it is now.

You are welcome to edit your submission and I will review again (or you can resubmit if your edit is substantial.)

Edit: Technically Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

Rating 6 - good detail and personal experience, but the specific info answering the question could be clearer.

Good answer will give it a 5 and move to a 6 once multiplier is updated to the correct number of 1.34.

Rating 5, could explain the multiplier a bit more.

This is a 5. Starting explanation is not necessary, response should be brief and straight to the point. Also, multiplier needs to be adjusted.

I accepted before where the reference to Overview post was more of a footnote, but on this question that is specifically about the upvote bonuses, the Complete Overview contains outdated information, so the reference to it makes the response technically wrong.

You are welcome to edit your submission and I will review again (or you can resubmit if your edit is substantial.)

Edit: Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I give this a 6 I like the screw it approach but some might not.

Rating is 5. Looks wack for a FAQ and is misleading. It's misleading in the fact that users are supposed to add @steembasicincome as a fan (on fanbase) rather than curation trail on steemauto.

Rating 4

Informal and unsuitable for FAQ. Steemauto curation trail has nothing to do at all with this.

Rating 5 - detailed, but a bit too informal for my liking. I usually like a "screw it" attitude, but an FAQ is probably not the right place for it.

Technically Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

There are not static pool assignments anymore, and the voting account for each upvote is dynamically selected when that upvote is delivered. It uses the highest VP account that can deliver the full upvote, and we are gradually scaling the accounts onto a fitted SP curve so that eventually members will mostly be upvoted by the same account every time and increasing your units, upvote multipliers, etc. will move you up the SP curve to be voted by a bigger account.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate a 4.  Mentions that upvoting can increase your vote value received, however referencing the different pools is outdated information.

I will give this a 3 for out of date info but if updated would get a 5

Rating is 3. Would have made sense with the outdated system.

Rating 3

Outdated, not specific enough.

3 clarity point

Pool separation is no longer a thing right?

Rating 3, outdated information

Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate this response 5.  It is completely accurate, however I feel each FAQ should contain the necessary information as a stand alone response - Reference to rshares could be confusing to a new member or potential member.

I am going to give this a 3 only cause it isn't written as a stand-alone answer. Saying it was already mentioned is like telling the person you should already know this when it could be the first question they came to.

Rating 3, should be a stand alone answer.

4 clarity point

Already mentioned on where? Also, rshares is not commonly known even among Steemians.

Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate this response 5. Accurate, and descriptive. However many STEEMians may never have come across the term rshares and mentioning it without context could confuse.

I am going to give this a 5 it is a good answer could have more info on terms.

I rate this as 6. It's not really explicit but provides some helpful tips.

Rating 6, mentioning steemauto is nice

Accurate. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.

Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.

I rate a 7.  An accurate, detailed without confusing response.  Clearly answers the question.

I give it a 7. Right answer and an example. Excellent.