RE: Thoughts for Curation Guilds by smooth

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @timcliff/re-snowflake-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t123110906z

· @smooth · (edited)
One of the ideas that has been tossed around is having some sort of investor-VESTS that would not have content voting rights (nor earn curation rewards) but would instead benefit from some higher interest rate (equivalent to lower inflation). This would mean that only actual social media users and not investment-motivated holders would be curating and earning curation rewards. 

I think this is probably a better solution than curation guilds because even _choosing and monitoring a guild that is doing a good job on curation_ is something that many investors are probably not interested in doing and won't do very well. There are some very tricky issues with making this work though.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id1,275,982
authorsmooth
permlinkre-timcliff-re-snowflake-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t181238900z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 18:12:39
last_update2016-10-31 18:14:54
depth3
children2
net_rshares12,208,760,232
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length687
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
Good point. I would support the idea of investor-vests. I think it would potentially solve a large part of the problem. I still really like the idea of guilds though, largely because of the social aspect. I think the idea of people banding together under a shared set of principles to help each other curate could add a lot of value (if it were implemented the right way). IMO, a combination of both curation guilds and investor-vests would be the most ideal.
properties (22)
post_id1,276,102
authortimcliff
permlinkre-smooth-re-timcliff-re-snowflake-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t184110359z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 18:41:09
last_update2016-10-31 18:41:09
depth4
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length459
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@smooth · (edited)
I support the social aspect of guilds as well, and I agree with the points you made in your post about guilds forming communities, having rankings, ways to communicate, etc. I don't think guilds are a great solution to the problem of investors not wanting to actively curate though, nor do I think it is generally a good idea for stake to be "rented out" (even more than is already happening). Stakeholders banding together to cooperate, exercise quality control over each other, and function as a community I do support.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id1,276,186
authorsmooth
permlinkre-timcliff-re-smooth-re-timcliff-re-snowflake-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t185516300z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 18:55:18
last_update2016-10-31 18:55:45
depth5
children0
net_rshares12,208,760,232
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length521
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)