RE: Hypothetically Speaking on Curation by sumatranate

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @skramatters/hypothetically-speaking-on-curation-e2hfqmbn

· @sumatranate ·
$0.02
Larger accounts definitely add value when they resteem, but I have a different twist on the idea.  This is a rough draft of my current thought process, so any input is appreciated.

What if there was a new resteem option that was basically *curation with commentary.*  When a person selected this option, the original post that is being resteemed would be preserved in a new post (no changes allowed), but the "curator" would have the option to add commentary that would be placed at the top of the post.  

Now the "curator" (the person with the large account who just started a new post) would be paid directly because they have developed the network and have the influence, but an automatic beneficiary payment would be sent to the original author (example: 35% of author rewards)

I see this as a feature similar to what Dlike.io does, but instead of including URLs from all websites, this would be exclusively available for Steem posts.  Also, the original content creator would be compensated as well.

Positives:
- More exposure for content creators as their posts are resteemed. 
- Influential accounts receive direct financial benefit for their promotional services.  The curated account gets an additional financial benefit for creating quality content.

Concerns:
- An influential user could attack a smaller account, but this can happen anyway.  However, if someone does so using this method to attack, the attacker ends up paying the person he or she is attacking, which should curb misuse. 

Thoughts?  Questions?  Not sure if this is a good idea or not, but it has been floating in my head.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id79,328,642
authorsumatranate
permlinkpwn981
categorycuration
json_metadata{"tags":["curation"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-08-22 15:19:12
last_update2019-08-22 15:19:12
depth1
children1
net_rshares115,591,794,893
last_payout2019-08-29 15:19:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.011 SBD
curator_payout_value0.011 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,605
author_reputation26,101,572,156,825
root_title"Hypothetically Speaking on Curation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@skramatters ·
My initial thoughts are I like where your heads at. I've often wished I could elaborate on a resteem and keep the conversation going if you will.  Your idea allows for this as well as creates some synergy or symbiosis between the original poster and the resteemer. Thus creating an opportunity for a new audience to say I agree or potentially disagree with either party.. 

We are lacking many of the core fundamental principles of social media and should heavily consider implementation of any features that can  create a more hospitable environment for engagement and healthy discussions.

I'm glad to know others have been thinking there's gotta be another way to do things.. Thanks for the input and due to the resteem by a deservedly more esteemed steemian than myself it's getting eyes.. That's the point!!

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/skramatters)
properties (22)
post_id79,329,118
authorskramatters
permlinkskramatters-re-sumatranate-pwn981-20190822t153308143z
categorycuration
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"android"}
created2019-08-22 15:33:09
last_update2019-08-22 15:33:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-08-29 15:33:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length886
author_reputation45,825,911,400,742
root_title"Hypothetically Speaking on Curation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000