Not playing moral police, per say.. I am pointing out abusive practices that are intentionally done in such a way as to hurt the platform. If he chooses to self vote, then do it on the first day, not the 7th 1 hour before it is due to pay out. Also perhaps upvote others as opposed to going straight to Bittrex with every penny from his abusive practices or perhaps invest in the platform and make a better community for us all and one that will last. Think about this. If everyone acted in the same form and fashion as the user described above, simply leased SP, self upovoted and sold.. then steem, SBD etc would suffer badly, as would the site. It would also at that point be nothing more than a glorified ponzi scheme. 

There are certain community standards that we should all strive to uphold here. It's not being the Moral Police to point out a user that is intentionally acting in a way that is deceptive and serves to benefit no one but himself. 

As a writer here, I would also be miffed is someone came to my blog and left a "hollow comment" with no purpose other than to upovote it for their own personal gain at a later point irrespective of the effort that I put into actually writing the article and trying to better the platform. 

Yes I am aggressive in tactics at times, but most often the serve to benefit us. Take for example his current SteemD.. he has for the moment at least began seriously upvoting other users as a result of me pointing out his abusive self voting practices. Now at least some other users are getting benefit from his leased SP and the wealth is being spread around a bit. Is it a hollow gesture on his behalf to only hid is previous actions? Yes.. but at least some others will feel some benefit now. 

So I don't feel bad.. I'm not worried about being an outcast, as there are many more that approve of my efforts to help the community. 

I do appreciate your comments though and I thank you for sharing your opinion..:)