Viewing a response to: @shadowspub/re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190428t101137620z
Judicious self-voting was originally intended as part of the system: having more stake meant you could bring attention to your ideas/messages. This would also give users a reason to accumulate Steem (there has to be a reason to hold Steem, otherwise it won't have any value, and there will be no reward pool to speak of). On the other hand, if you self-voted on entirely silly things, the idea is that you would get downvoted.
post_id | 73,849,968 |
---|---|
author | blocktrades |
permlink | re-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190428t155817187z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-28 15:58:15 |
last_update | 2019-04-28 15:58:15 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 156,193,573 |
last_payout | 2019-05-05 15:58:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 426 |
author_reputation | 321,119,490,936,483 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
moeknows | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
hashbrownhustla | 0 | 156,193,573 | 100% |
Such a simple concept yet so hard to understand. @blocktrades, concerning the reason to hold Steem, I think commerce is the best reason of all. We need to get more businesses selling everyday things on Steem.
post_id | 74,229,278 |
---|---|
author | moeknows |
permlink | re-blocktrades-re-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190505t182750628z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"users":["blocktrades"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-05-05 18:27:51 |
last_update | 2019-05-05 18:27:51 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 40,446,546,763 |
last_payout | 2019-05-12 18:27:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 210 |
author_reputation | 9,722,496,103,749 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
smartvote | 0 | 40,446,546,763 | 0.68% |
Yes, more business buying/selling with Steem is definitely super beneficial. That, after all, is the original design goal for cryptocurrency. But it's a tough nut to crack because it's competing against an entrenched competitor (fiat currency) and it's been an uphill battle for all cryptocurrencies to make a dent there. One of Steem's advantages over many other cryptocurrencies is that it has other reasons beside commerce for holding it.
post_id | 74,251,465 |
---|---|
author | blocktrades |
permlink | re-moeknows-re-blocktrades-re-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190506t043513522z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-05-06 04:35:12 |
last_update | 2019-05-06 04:35:12 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 152,820,929 |
last_payout | 2019-05-13 04:35:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 441 |
author_reputation | 321,119,490,936,483 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
hashbrownhustla | 0 | 152,820,929 | 100% |