Viewing a response to: @sorin.cristescu/adbb1b48-c967-445a-ade1-a75a75669cde
Hey, I think 50%/50% are fair. Because to curate is a hart job. If you read a ton of article and Reward the best ones, its hart work. Like 100 cooking recipes. A user want only to read the best but if you curate them, thats a ton of work. In my opinion is curating more work then writing ( depens on article for sure). The next point is, you need to spend Money ( buy Steem) to get higher votes. So why i should spend money as a Voter? I would Favour 75% curator 25% Author ( or maybe a Slider). Reason 1: Make Vote selling less profitable. Reason 2: Because of the work to curate all this Stuff Reason 3: Curator need to power up for huge votes, so there Trust the Steem Blockchain for longer Term. Reason 4: The decision is more easy to upvote as a Investor, if there is no more profitable way. I think Authors get more Rewards. Because Vote Sellers maybe think " hey i can reward the Content i really like and i dont lost some Steem ROI". We should work on a System that is not so easy to game. Or Stop the Voting System and make a Subscription System out of it. I think Authors should get a aditional Author Coin too, maybe a SMT.
post_id | 73,635,266 |
---|---|
author | freddio |
permlink | re-sorincristescu-adbb1b48-c967-445a-ade1-a75a75669cde-20190424t080614408z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steempeak\/1.9.8"} |
created | 2019-04-24 08:06:00 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 08:09:03 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 08:06:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,150 |
author_reputation | 11,277,743,744,431 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |