RE: Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50? by midlet

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @midlet/b970c80c-7f07-43d5-aea8-3486d09598da

· @midlet ·
$0.10
I think the best system would be a sliding scale based on SP. When you have less than 100 SP you receive almost all your author rewards, and by the time you hit orca you're at 50/50. 

Curation rewards are totally trivial until you're at about dolphin level which very few people are, so I think the reality is this is a big problem, but for only a few people, and I think people are overestimating the positive effect on distribution this would have. 

I think it would also make Steem less attractive for creators and I think they're the primary demographic we need to attract.

I think a sliding scale would let you transition from user to investor. I think this makes sense from the investor perspective, but I think in the end most users would be negatively affected.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id73,788,266
authormidlet
permlinkre-midlet-b970c80c-7f07-43d5-aea8-3486d09598da-20190427t071248766z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-27 07:12:51
last_update2019-04-27 07:12:51
depth2
children0
net_rshares189,051,758,578
last_payout2019-05-04 07:12:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.072 SBD
curator_payout_value0.023 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length772
author_reputation169,390,437,178,762
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)