RE: Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50? by reazuliqbal

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @theycallmedan/should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050

· @reazuliqbal · (edited)
$0.03
Voted for 
  - No

I do not think 50/50 would encourage manual curation or reduce usage of bid bots. Using 50/50 doesn't mean every voters (if any) will get 50% of their vote value back rather the curation bots that vote at optimal time will get a lot back from their investment.

To my knowledge all current bid-bots take 25% curation split into account in calculating ROI, they might as well take 50% into account by changing 2-3 lines of codes. Some share curation rewards with the delegators now, so they will have no problem sharing then.

Lastly and most important to me, I want bigger rewards for the creators, they put time and efforts into creating contents, so they should receive more, not a person with huge stake or a bot that votes indiscriminately.
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id73,626,717
authorreazuliqbal
permlink0b82d6a2-f57b-4218-9037-22e3b4546802
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1","content_type":"poll_vote","votes":["No"]}
created2019-04-24 04:31:45
last_update2019-04-24 04:53:18
depth1
children0
net_rshares78,262,435,370
last_payout2019-05-01 04:31:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 SBD
curator_payout_value0.008 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length763
author_reputation53,978,675,295,884
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries
0.
accountdpoll.curation
weight500
1.
accountdpoll.sponsors
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)