RE: Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50? by spectrumecons

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @edb/75ecfeec-2264-488f-8945-dc30145001a5

· @spectrumecons ·
> It would be better if voting would cost money

Voting does indirectly cost money. The rewards pool used for voting content comes from increasing the supply of Steem, which puts pressure on lowering the price of Steem (inflation). To cover the cost of inflation requires self-voting. Every vote for someone else is distributing coins to someone else which is like paying. The purpose of voting is to reward content that adds value to the platform. This is a community effort.
properties (22)
post_id73,698,648
authorspectrumecons
permlinkre-edb-75ecfeec-2264-488f-8945-dc30145001a5-20190425t114637570z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-25 11:46:36
last_update2019-04-25 11:46:36
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-05-02 11:46:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length476
author_reputation78,624,076,172,973
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000