RE: Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50? by steevc

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @theycallmedan/should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050

· @steevc ·
$0.12
Voted for 
  - No


My instinct is against this. Gaining 100% on my curation rewards would be wiped out by what I lost of post rewards and that would be the same for most non-orcas/whales. I know some of those who invested big initially would like a better return, but I think Steem has much to gain if it can get many more small accounts. Maybe it needs some adjustment, but this seems too big.

Of course vote buying is a big problem as it skews the rewards with little relation to quality. Perhaps there could be some change to reduce the impact of votes above a certain level, but I expect the vote sellers would find ways around that, e.g. using lots of accounts.

Steem will never be perfect, but I hope it can keep going anyway.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
post_id73,798,643
authorsteevc
permlink55223768-e83a-4d12-962f-758da3ea135c
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll","poll"],"app":"dpoll\/0.0.2","content_type":"poll_vote","votes":["No"]}
created2019-04-27 12:57:48
last_update2019-04-27 12:57:48
depth1
children0
net_rshares258,353,256,456
last_payout2019-05-04 12:57:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.088 SBD
curator_payout_value0.032 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length739
author_reputation273,317,013,544,223
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries
0.
accountdpoll.curation
weight500
1.
accountdpoll.sponsors
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)