No, I never intend to continue with stories. Too much to consider, kind of like small details

To quote and summarize from one of the comments

>A couple of experiments aided by them drugging her.
Each one changed her perception of what she had experienced.
She recalls the same experience.
With different perceptions based on the circumstances (of the experimental drugs)

The baby,eyes and smile were my way to simply explain the changes in her perception between positive and negative, I might say that the final one would be the neutral perception or generally agreed on.

As the lights dim, or the baby dies these are negative.
Friendly eyes, bright lights, baby is alive these are positive.
In the final list, I attempted a balance of both, which is a generally agreed upon reality, or perception. Sure you can still see brighter lights than others this is still your personal perception in relation to other information. It would be a warped perception I think to see a dead baby when it is instead sleeping, obviously assuming the mother is not crying or screaming. 

I hope this provides some insight into what I was thinking. I would say that answering all the comments I had to also stop and think a bit about what my intention was so sure it might not all be concrete but I feel that is why I personally enjoyed writing it this way.  Someone else could take the story and continue or even cover it in more detail to form something I could never have imagined.