Viewing a response to: @inertia/dstors
I won't say I'm the most clued up on the specifics of the whole saga I read a few posts on it but all in all tempers aside I think its good that community members have these discussions out in the open. Voicing all possible concerns and going through scenarios is whats going to make open source projects innovate faster. As someone who has created their own product in the past I know how you can fall into some of your own biases and those who prop you up and only give you positive feedback may just help keep you in your echo chamber. Criticism is hard to take but when its good its free advice, or that's how I see it. I did see a bit of personal bashing and insulting along the way which I think we should move past, we're not Facebook users lol and thats going to leave a bitter taste in alot of investors and possible users mouths going forward. Really hope the project will work out for the best!
| post_id | 67,849,972 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| author | chekohler | ||||||
| permlink | re-inertia-20181224t133630668z | ||||||
| category | dstors | ||||||
| json_metadata | {"format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem.app","app":"esteem\/2.0.3-surfer","tags":["dstors"]} | ||||||
| created | 2018-12-24 11:36:30 | ||||||
| last_update | 2018-12-24 11:36:30 | ||||||
| depth | 1 | ||||||
| children | 1 | ||||||
| net_rshares | 4,487,375,374,354 | ||||||
| last_payout | 2018-12-31 11:36:30 | ||||||
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||
| total_payout_value | 1.720 SBD | ||||||
| curator_payout_value | 0.636 SBD | ||||||
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
| promoted | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
| body_length | 913 | ||||||
| author_reputation | 126,862,519,810,326 | ||||||
| root_title | dstors | ||||||
| beneficiaries |
| ||||||
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD | ||||||
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 | ||||||
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inertia | 0 | 1,426,063,734,483 | 100% | ||
| dstors | 0 | 3,061,311,639,871 | 11% |
Voicing concerns to someone who is non-responsive does nothing for innovation. An example of non-responsive would be: "Hey, did you sweep the floor?" And instead of answering the question they say, "Sweeping the floor would be a good idea." The reply is an attempt to dissuade the need for a responsive answer like "Yes" or "No." While I agree that voicing concerns is a good first step, if the replies are non-responsive, it causes innovation to slow. Regarding the personal bashing, I agree it would be nice if people could move past it. But it reveals information as well. In some of these threads I have seen **a)** hard questions, followed immediately by **b)** a mix of responsive and non-responsive replies, then **c)** more hard and progressively more pointed questions, followed by **d)** tantrums and personal attacks. It didn't have to go there. Hard questions and even criticisms are productive. Interpreting hard questions and criticisms as personal attacks reveals a fundamental problem.
| post_id | 67,868,397 |
|---|---|
| author | inertia |
| permlink | re-chekohler-re-inertia-20181224t203200704z |
| category | dstors |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["dstors"]} |
| created | 2018-12-24 20:32:00 |
| last_update | 2018-12-24 20:32:00 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 3,072,173,713,367 |
| last_payout | 2018-12-31 20:32:00 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 1.288 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.429 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 1,011 |
| author_reputation | 227,335,189,892,062 |
| root_title | dstors |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baah | 0 | 4,222,464,755 | 100% | ||
| dstors | 0 | 3,067,951,248,612 | 11% |