Viewing a response to: @dan/eos-developer-s-log-stardate-20176-30
My understanding of how EOS achieves massive transaction speed / scalability is that it delegates block production to a single actor for each block. How is block forgery NOT possibly a problem? I've read the explanations and it's somehow 'the longest chain wins' like Bitcoin ... but I don't see how that actually applies in a 'one actor per block' scheme? One actor just forges, block is hashed, boom, done: nobody the wiser. Hope my question makes sense :) and I'd love to know the answer! Big fan of EOS in all other ways than this lingering doubt.
post_id | 5,822,059 |
---|---|
author | mouradsayed |
permlink | re-dan-eos-developer-s-log-stardate-20176-30-20170701t211327643z |
category | eos |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["eos"]}" |
created | 2017-07-01 21:13:39 |
last_update | 2017-07-01 21:13:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 1,245,701,633 |
last_payout | 2017-07-08 21:13:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 551 |
author_reputation | 2,314,432,101 |
root_title | "EOS - Developer’s Log Stardate 20176.30" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
steffenfrost | 0 | 212,689,699 | 100% | ||
mouradsayed | 0 | 1,033,011,934 | 100% |