RE: Flagging is not censorship by makerhacks

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @contentjunkie/re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-themarkymark-re-contentjunkie-re-stabilowl-re-solcross-re-themarkymark-flagging-is-not-censorship-20180502t193324810z

· @makerhacks ·
> This account shares movie trailers

And how are you adding anything to Steemit by doing that? What is your unique contribution?

> something that happens on social media

Steemit is not twitter or Reddit. Those communities do not pay you out of a reward pool for your contributions and added value. Check that FAQ that I shared.

>  some how doesn't fit with your vision

It doesn't fit STINC vision. 

Regardless, you are not being "censored", you are being downvoted. To use your words, 
"*something that happens on social media*"
properties (22)
post_id46,604,779
authormakerhacks
permlinkre-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-themarkymark-re-contentjunkie-re-stabilowl-re-solcross-re-themarkymark-flagging-is-not-censorship-20180502t193901189z
categoryflags
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["flags"]}"
created2018-05-02 19:39:00
last_update2018-05-02 19:39:00
depth10
children6
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-09 19:39:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length534
author_reputation36,122,498,173,027
root_title"Flagging is not censorship"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@contentjunkie ·
$3.27
Seriously dude scroll up I've answered that question twice now. The existence of central repository for movie trailers is unique.

Steemit is inspired by those other social networks and so using it as such only naturally follows.  I'm not sure what bringing up Steem's value proposition over competitors has to do with your point though. 

The fact is some people watch the videos and upvote the posts. That falsifies your zero value added to the platform. All it takes is a single upvote to objectively say value was added for someone that deemed it such.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 12 others
properties (23)
post_id46,605,554
authorcontentjunkie
permlinkre-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-themarkymark-re-contentjunkie-re-stabilowl-re-solcross-re-themarkymark-flagging-is-not-censorship-20180502t194523324z
categoryflags
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["flags"]}"
created2018-05-02 19:45:27
last_update2018-05-02 19:45:27
depth11
children5
net_rshares586,481,034,364
last_payout2018-05-09 19:45:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.519 SBD
curator_payout_value0.750 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length556
author_reputation253,772,433,596,459
root_title"Flagging is not censorship"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (76)
@makerhacks ·
> The existence of central repository for movie trailers is unique

Google movie trailers. How are you unique? Name one thing you do extra/better than any of the other central repositories of movie trailers? 

You have put way more effort into these comments defending yourself, why not channel that energy into contributing?

>  All it takes is a single upvote

I would agree if it was not for the fact there are so many automated and sock puppet upvotes and comments.
properties (22)
post_id46,606,095
authormakerhacks
permlinkre-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-themarkymark-re-contentjunkie-re-stabilowl-re-solcross-re-themarkymark-flagging-is-not-censorship-20180502t194951827z
categoryflags
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["flags"]}"
created2018-05-02 19:49:51
last_update2018-05-02 19:49:51
depth12
children4
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-09 19:49:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length469
author_reputation36,122,498,173,027
root_title"Flagging is not censorship"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@contentjunkie ·
$3.21
properties (23)
post_id46,606,434
authorcontentjunkie
permlinkre-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-makerhacks-re-contentjunkie-re-themarkymark-re-contentjunkie-re-stabilowl-re-solcross-re-themarkymark-flagging-is-not-censorship-20180502t195226122z
categoryflags
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["flags"]}"
created2018-05-02 19:52:30
last_update2018-05-02 19:52:30
depth13
children3
net_rshares576,753,784,102
last_payout2018-05-09 19:52:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.477 SBD
curator_payout_value0.736 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length144
author_reputation253,772,433,596,459
root_title"Flagging is not censorship"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (76)