RE: @freedom by igster

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @lazariko12/re-ozchartart-freedom-20170601t101113676z

· @igster · (edited)
$17.20
Seems like there is a whale group supporting oz (Bernie and his crew) and @freedom who doesn't like it. Both groups are using their shares to distribute reward pool as they see fit.

Also as community we need to start being more critical about post rewards. This is pointed to both authors and curators. Both parties at the moment seem to be increasingly happier as post rewards grow. As Steem gains in value, extra rewards seem to distribute vertically rather than horizontally - meaning select few will rake in thousands or even more.  Is this the wisdom of crowd? Can WE do better? And if we can't, how will the Steemit look within few years? 

Only once have I seen author voice their concern of possibly getting too much rewards here and he is one of the greatest contributors of value here. Funny how that works. If only we   we could start including more people to our little inner circles, this is social platform after all.
👍  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id3,263,817
authorigster
permlinkre-lazariko12-re-ozchartart-freedom-20170601t103849956z
categoryfreedom
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["freedom"], "tags": ["freedom"]}"
created2017-06-01 10:39:00
last_update2017-06-01 18:20:03
depth2
children0
net_rshares3,287,374,293,842
last_payout2017-06-08 10:39:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value13.792 SBD
curator_payout_value3.412 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length932
author_reputation17,422,525,591,287
root_title@freedom
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)