RE: Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus by smooth

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @snowflake/re-liberosist-re-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t205108537z

· @smooth ·
$0.26
If there is a major problem with 'bypassing' then bots can be told to aggregate all delagated stake votes. Since the delgation is on-chain it is visible. Actually moving the stake to smaller accounts is a bigger potential problem. I agree as you know that better investor-class incentives are needed.
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,408
authorsmooth
permlinkre-snowflake-re-liberosist-re-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t184542369z
categoryhardfork-17
json_metadata{}
created2017-03-20 23:48:21
last_update2017-03-20 23:48:21
depth3
children0
net_rshares396,370,275,368
last_payout2017-04-20 18:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.198 SBD
curator_payout_value0.065 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length300
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)