Viewing a response to: @adamzero/qhv3ju
# 1551 Since I have just given main a gluttony for 1550, there is a new precedent and I have also given you one. Depending on perspective this could be seen as greater or lesser reward than crowns, but it seems fitting. Also worth noting is that giving rewards for +1 over previous best is a terribly abusable notion, but feel free to go higher anyway for more pseudo random prizes. (this goes for anyone reading also)
post_id | 87,913,107 |
---|---|
author | thegrandestine |
permlink | qhxaof |
category | hive-135459 |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.2"} |
created | 2020-10-09 07:12:36 |
last_update | 2020-10-09 07:12:36 |
depth | 2 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 252,934,624,214 |
last_payout | 2020-10-16 07:12:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.026 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.027 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 419 |
author_reputation | 2,847,373,536,883 |
root_title | "Gluttony's infinite Pride puzzle" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
alphacore | 0 | 252,934,624,214 | 50% |
are you giving +1 gluttony for each point gained
post_id | 87,963,858 |
---|---|
author | main-gi |
permlink | qi2ccc |
category | hive-135459 |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.2"} |
created | 2020-10-12 00:36:12 |
last_update | 2020-10-12 00:36:12 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 307,413,788,421 |
last_payout | 2020-10-19 00:36:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.031 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.031 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 48 |
author_reputation | 1,449,142,558,794 |
root_title | "Gluttony's infinite Pride puzzle" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 0 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
alphacore | 0 | 250,413,643,201 | 50% | ||
thegrandestine | 0 | 57,000,145,220 | 100% |
it seems like a reasonable prize considering the challenge becomes progressively more difficult and initial contest set the bar pretty high to begin with, but some obvious flaws are possibly overshadowing initial prize or someone with 1600 solution trying to farm 50 copies of gluttony, lol
post_id | 88,001,947 |
---|---|
author | thegrandestine |
permlink | qi6xub |
category | hive-135459 |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.2"} |
created | 2020-10-14 12:11:06 |
last_update | 2020-10-14 12:12:51 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-10-21 12:11:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 290 |
author_reputation | 2,847,373,536,883 |
root_title | "Gluttony's infinite Pride puzzle" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
maybe something like +3 points = 1 gluttony is more reasonable, since I am definitely going to try farming gluttony copies with +1 improvements. But pretend I never said that
post_id | 88,004,791 |
---|---|
author | main-gi |
permlink | qi77r4 |
category | hive-135459 |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.2"} |
created | 2020-10-14 15:45:06 |
last_update | 2020-10-14 15:45:06 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-10-21 15:45:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 174 |
author_reputation | 1,449,142,558,794 |
root_title | "Gluttony's infinite Pride puzzle" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 0 |